切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (01) : 23 -26. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2018.01.007

所属专题: 文献

实验研究

建立MALDI-TOF MS鉴定的海洋致病性弧菌数据库样本前处理的适宜条件
周月霞1, 胡成进2,()   
  1. 1. 274000 菏泽医学专科学校检验教研室
    2. 250031 济南军区总医院实验诊断科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-04 出版日期:2018-02-28
  • 通信作者: 胡成进
  • 基金资助:
    全军医学科研计划重点项目资助课题(BWS12J014)

Research on the suitable sample processing conditions for establishing marine pathogenic vibrio database based on MALDI-TOF MS

Yuexia Zhou1, Chengjin Hu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine , Heze Medical College, Heze 24000, China
    2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital of Jinan Military Region of PLA, Jinan 250031, China
  • Received:2017-09-04 Published:2018-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Chengjin Hu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hu Chengjin, Email:
引用本文:

周月霞, 胡成进. 建立MALDI-TOF MS鉴定的海洋致病性弧菌数据库样本前处理的适宜条件[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2018, 06(01): 23-26.

Yuexia Zhou, Chengjin Hu. Research on the suitable sample processing conditions for establishing marine pathogenic vibrio database based on MALDI-TOF MS[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(01): 23-26.

目的

探讨建立基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization time of flight mass spectrometry,MALDI-TOF MS)鉴定海洋致病性弧菌数据库前样本处理的适宜条件,为完善MALDI-TOF MS鉴定该菌入数据库提供参考。

方法

将32株海洋致病性弧菌培养至24、48、72 h时,分别用直接转移法、扩展的直接转移法、甲酸提取法得到上机样品,然后用MALDI-TOF MS进行采图鉴定,用SPSS20.0软件进行统计学分析,对样本不同培养时间及3种处理方法的鉴定结果进行比较评价。

结果

培养24 h鉴定分数平均值为2.321,属水平鉴定正确率为96.88%,种水平鉴定正确率为90.63%;培养48 h鉴定分数平均值为2.315,属水平鉴定正确率为93.75%,种水平鉴定正确率为90.63%;培养72 h鉴定分数平均值为2.316,属水平鉴定正确率为93.75%,种水平鉴定正确率为87.50%,3种不同培养时间的前处理方法鉴定至属(P=0.129)、鉴定到种(P=0.078),差异均无统计学意义。直接转移法鉴定分数平均值为1.986,属水平鉴定正确率为78.13%,种水平鉴定分数为59.38%;扩展的直接转移法鉴定分数平均值为2.135,属水平鉴定正确率为90.63%,种水平鉴定正确率为78.13%;甲酸提取法鉴定分数平均值为2.306,属水平鉴定正确率为96.88%,种水平鉴定分数为90.63%,3种不同上机前样本处理方法鉴定到属时差异有统计学意义(P=0.006);鉴定到种时差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.691,P=0.013)。

结论

建立MALDI-TOF MS海洋致病性弧菌数据库时,选择培养时间24 h的甲酸法提取菌体蛋白的前处理方法较适宜,可得到高质量的蛋白指纹图谱和鉴定正确率。

Objective

To explore the suitable sample processing conditions of establishing marine pathogenic vibrio database based on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS).

Methods

Thirty-two strains of marine pathogenic vibrio were cultured for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and then identified respectively by direct transfer method, extensional direct transfer method and formic acid extraction method. The results were statistically analyzed with SPSS20.0 statistical analysis software to find the suitable conditions for establishing MALDI-TOF MS marine pathogenic vibrio database.

Results

The average value of 24 h culture identification score was 2.321 with the accuracy rate of genus identification was 96.88% and species identification was 90.63%. The average value of 48 h identification score was 2.315 with the accuracy rate of genus identification was 93.75% and the species identification was 90.63%. The average value of 72 h culture identification score was 2.316 with the accuracy rate of genus identification was 93.75% and the species identification was 87.50%. There was no statistical difference among these three pretreatment methods (P=0.129、P=0.078). In contrast, the average value of identification score by direct transfer method was 1.986, with the accuracy rate of genus identification was 78.13%, and the species identification was 59.38%; the average value of the extended direct transfer method was 2.135 with the accuracy rate of genus identification was 90.63% and the species identification was 78.13%; the average value of formic acid extraction was 2.306 with the accuracy rate of genus identification was 96.88% and species identification was 90.63%. There were significant differences among the three kinds of pretreatment methods on genus level (P=0.006) and species level(χ2=8.691, P=0.013).

Conclusions

In the establishment of MALDI-TOF MS marine pathogenic vibrio database, the culture time should be set at 24h and the pretreatment method should be formic acid extraction method, which can get high quality protein fingerprints.

表1 实验用海洋致病性弧菌信息
表2 MALDI-TOF MS鉴定32株不同培养时间海洋致病性弧菌结果比较[株数(%)]
表3 MALDI-TOF-MS鉴定培养24 h的32株样本3种前处理海洋致病性弧菌结果比较[株数(%)]
1
周月霞,胡成进,陈英剑. MALDI-TOF MS微生物鉴定数据库研究进展[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2016,34(6):447-450.
2
Turhan O, Ozhak-Baysan B, Zaragoza O, et al. Evaluation of MALDI-TOF-MS for the identification of yeast isolates causing bloodstream infection[J]. Clin Lab, 2017,63(4):699-703.
3
Economopoulou A, Chochlakis D, Almpan MA, et al. Environmental investigation for the presence of Vibrio species following a case of severe gastroenteritis in a touristic island[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2017,24(5):4835-4840.
4
Spinali S, van Belkum A, Goering RV, et al. Microbial typing by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry: do we need guidance for data interpretation[J]? J Clin Microbiol, 2015,53(3):760-765.
5
Taneja N, Sethuraman N, Mishra A, et al. The 2002 Chandigarh cholera outbreak revisited: utility of MALDI-TOF as a molecular epidemiology tool[J]. Lett Appl Microbiol, 2016,62(6):452-458.
6
Veloo1 AC, Elgersma PE, Friedrich AW, et al. The influence of incubation time, sample preparation and exposure to oxygen on the quality of the MALDI-TOF MS spectrum of anaerobic bacteria[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2014,20(6):1091-1097.
7
Singhal N, Kumar M, Kanaujia PK, et al. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry:an emerging technology for microbial identification and diagnosis[J]. Front Microbiol, 2015,6(791):1-16.
8
Goldstein JE, Zhang L, Borror CM, et al. Rago JVCulture conditions and sample preparation methods affect spectrum quality and reproducibility during profiling of Staphylococcus aureus with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry[J]. Lett Appl Microbiol, 2013,57(2):144-150.
9
Ford BA, Burnham CA. Optimization of routine identification of clinically relevant Gram-negative bacteria by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and the Bruker Biotyper[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2013,51(5):1412-1420.
[1] 陈光炼, 刘海英, 高坎坎, 关小珊, 钟华敏, 邓秋连, 谌亚星, 梁文怡, 蒋莹, 谢永强, 黄莲芬. B族链球菌基质辅助激光解析电离飞行时间质谱蛋白指纹特征肽峰验证研究[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 209-215.
[2] 王育英, 曹敬荣, 兰贺, 赵越, 谢威, 王岩, 闵嵘, 王培昌. 构巢曲霉致肺曲霉病患者二例临床特征和病原学分析[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 413-416.
[3] 王岩, 曹敬荣, 常玥, 陈典典, 段园园, 王育英, 闵嵘, 王培昌. 分离胶法与十二烷基硫酸钠法在血培养阳性瓶基质辅助激光解析电离飞行时间质谱病原菌直接鉴定中的应用[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(04): 324-329.
阅读次数
全文


摘要