切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 65 -75. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2022.02.001

论著

基于生物信息学对直肠癌中m6A调节因子介导相关修饰模式的分析
周威1, 胡山2, 柳金强1, 段理理1, 钮瞭然1, 洪流1,(), 樊代明1   
  1. 1. 710032 陕西西安,空军军医大学第一附属医院消化病医院
    2. 100017 北京,解放军61889部队卫生所
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-31 出版日期:2022-05-28
  • 通信作者: 洪流
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82073210)

Analysis of m6A regulatory factor mediated modification patterns in rectal cancer based on Bioinformatics

Wei Zhou1, Shan Hu2, Jinqiang Liu1, Lili Duan1, Liaoran Niu1, Liu Hong1,(), Daiming Fan1   

  1. 1. Digestive Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an Shanxi 710032, China
    2. The Health Center of PLA Unit 61889, Beijing 100017, China
  • Received:2021-12-31 Published:2022-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Liu Hong
引用本文:

周威, 胡山, 柳金强, 段理理, 钮瞭然, 洪流, 樊代明. 基于生物信息学对直肠癌中m6A调节因子介导相关修饰模式的分析[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 65-75.

Wei Zhou, Shan Hu, Jinqiang Liu, Lili Duan, Liaoran Niu, Liu Hong, Daiming Fan. Analysis of m6A regulatory factor mediated modification patterns in rectal cancer based on Bioinformatics[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(02): 65-75.

目的

探索N6-甲基腺嘌呤(m6A)修饰在肿瘤形成及与肿瘤微环境(TME)形成中的关系。

方法

基于23个m6A调节因子对288例直肠癌标本的m6A修饰模式进行综合评估,以确定直肠癌中m6A修饰模式和m6A相关基因特征,并评估基于PCA算法的m6A评分方案与免疫治疗反应之间的相关性。

结果

本研究分析了23个m6A调节因子在直肠癌中的表达和突变情况,及其与患者预后的关系,进一步在直肠癌样本中确定了三种不同的m6A修饰模式,分析其与不同的临床特征有关,并且证明m6A评分可以预测患者对抗PD-1/PD-L1免疫治疗的临床反应。

结论

m6A修饰异常与肿瘤的发生发展密切相关,并且在TME多样性和复杂性的形成中起着重要作用,评估肿瘤中的m6A修饰模式将有助于指导更有效的免疫治疗策略。

Objective

To explore the relationship between m6A modification and tumor microenvironment (TME).

Methods

The m6A modification pattern of 288 rectal cancer specimens was comprehensively evaluated based on 23 m6A regulators (RC) to determine the m6A modification pattern and m6A related gene characteristics in RC, and to evaluate the correlation between m6A scoring scheme based on PCA algorithm and immunotherapy response.

Results

This study analyzed the expression and mutation of 23 m6A regulatory factors in RC and their relationship with the prognosis of patient. Further, three different m6A modification modes were identified in RC samples, which were related to different clinical characteristics. It was proved that m6A score could predict the clinical response of patients to PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.

Conclusions

This study showed that the abnormal m6A modification was closely related to the occurrence and development of tumors, and played an important role in the formation of diversity and complexity of TME. Evaluating the m6A modification mode in tumors will help to guide more effective immunotherapy strategies.

图1 直肠癌中m6A调节因子的遗传变异注:1A为23个m6A调控因子的PPI网络;1B为23个m6A调节因子的CNV突变频率;1C为染色体上m6A调节因子CNV改变的位置;1D为正常和直肠癌样本之间23种m6A调节因子mRNA表达水平的差异;1E为直肠癌中23个m6A甲基化修饰调节因子的相关性;1F为23种m6A调节因子在136例直肠癌患者中的突变频率;1G为m6A基因在ZC3H13基因不同突变组之间的差异情况
表1 直肠癌中m6A调节因子与直肠癌患者生存的关系
图2 直肠癌中m6A调节因子与生存的关系注:2A为直肠癌患者预后相关的m6A调节因子;2B为直肠癌中m6A调节因子的表达相互作用
图3 m6A修饰模式的确定注:3A通过m6A调节因子的表达相似性将直肠癌分为三型;3B为三个m6A分型的直肠癌患者生存曲线图;3C为三个m6A分型患者的临床症状热图;3D为23个m6A调节因子在三个基因分型中的表达。aP<0.05;bP<0.01;cP<0.001
图4 基于m6A分组间的DEGs构建基因分型注:4A通过m6A表型相关标记基因将直肠癌分为三型;4B为三个基因分型的直肠癌患者生存曲线图;4C为不同基因分型患者的临床症状热图;4D为23个m6A调节因子在三个基因分型中的表达。aP<0.05;bP<0.01;cP<0.001
图5 m6A评分预测免疫治疗的获益注:5A为m6A评分与免疫细胞的相关性;5B为低或高m6A评分组中5年内存活或死亡的患者比例;5C为存活和死亡患者的m6A评分;5D为低或高m6A评分组之间PD-L1表达的差异;5E为低或高m6A评分组在CTLA4抗体和PD-1抗体表达阳性(pos)和阴性(neg)时的表达水平
1
Ma JZ, Yang F, Zhou CC, et al. METTL14 suppresses the metastatic potential of hepatocellular carcinoma by modulating N6-methyladenosine-dependent primary MicroRNA processing[J]. Hepatology, 2017, 65(2): 529-543.
2
Patil DP, Chen CK, Pickering BF, et al. M(6)A RNA methylation promotes XIST-mediated transcriptional repression[J]. Nature, 2016, 537(7620): 369-373.
3
Wang X, Ma R, Zhang XL, et al. Crosstalk between N6-methyladenosine modification and circular RNAs: current understanding and future directions[J]. Mol Cancer, 2021, 20(1): 121.
4
Dixit D, Prager BC, Gimple RC, et al. The RNA m6A reader YTHDF2 maintains oncogene expression and is a targetable dependency in glioblastoma stem cells[J]. Cancer Discov, 2020, 11(2): 480-499.
5
Zhou ZJ, Lv JC, Yu H, et al. Mechanism of RNA modification N6-methyladenosine in human cancer[J]. Mol Cancer, 2020, 19(1): 104.
6
Chen B, Li Y, Song RF, et al. Functions of RNA N6-methyladenosine modification in cancer progression[J]. Mol Biol Rep, 2019, 46(2): 2567-2575.
7
Grady WM, Yu M, Markowitz SD. Epigenetic alterations in the gastrointestinal tract: current and emerging use for biomarkers of cancer[J]. Gastroenterology, 2020, 160(3): 690-709.
8
Morais M, Pinto DM, Machado JC, et al. Liquid biopsy for rectal cancer: A systematic review[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2022, 48(1): 218-227.
9
Huyghe JR, Harrison TA, Bien SA, et al. Genetic architectures of proximal and distal colorectal cancer are partly distinct[J]. Gut, 2021, 70(7): 1325-1334.
10
Liu ZX, Li LM, Sun HL, et al. Link between m6A modification and cancers[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2018, 6: 89.
11
Deng LJ, Deng WQ, Fan SR, et al. M6A modification: recent advances, anticancer targeted drug discovery and beyond[J]. Mol Cancer, 2022, 21(1): 52.
12
An YY, Duan H. The role of m6A RNA methylation in cancer metabolism[J]. Mol Cancer, 2022, 21(1): 14.
13
Cai CJ, Long J, Huang QQ, et al. M6A "writer" gene METTL14: A favorable prognostic biomarker and correlated with immune infiltrates in rectal cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 615296.
14
Li M, Zha X, Wang SJ. The role of N6-methyladenosine mRNA in the tumor microenvironment[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2021, 1875(2): 188522.
15
Si CH, Chen C, Guo YX, et al. Effect, mechanism, and applications of coding/non-coding RNA m6A modification in tumor microenvironment[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2021, 9: 711815.
16
Zhang B, Wu Q, Li B, et al. m6A regulator-mediated methylation modification patterns and tumor microenvironment infiltration characterization in gastric cancer[J]. Mol Cancer, 2020, 19(1): 53.
17
Zhuang JF, Lin CL, Ye JX. m6A RNA methylation regulators contribute to malignant progression in rectal cancer[J]. J Cell Physiol, 2020, 235(9): 6300-6306.
18
Chong W, Shang L, Liu J, et al. m6A regulator-based methylation modification patterns characterized by distinct tumor microenvironment immune profiles in colon cancer[J]. Theranostics, 2021, 11(5): 2201-2217.
19
Agatemor C, Middleton SAD, Toledo D. How pervasive are post-translational and -transcriptional modifications?[J]. Trends Cell Biol, 2021, S0962-8924(21)00228-2.
20
Zheng HX, Zhang XS, Sui N. Advances in the profiling of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications[J]. Biotechnol Adv, 2020, 45: 107656.
21
Zhao YC, Chen YH, Jin M, et al. The crosstalk between m6A RNA methylation and other epigenetic regulators: A novel perspective in epigenetic remodeling[J]. Theranostics, 2021, 11(9): 4549-4566.
22
Uddin MB, Wang ZS, Yang CF. The m6A RNA methylation regulates oncogenic signaling pathways driving cell malignant transformation and carcinogenesis[J]. Mol Cancer, 2021, 20(1): 61.
23
Zaccara S, Ries RJ, Jaffrey SR. Reading, writing and erasing mRNA methylation[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2019, 20(10): 608-624.
24
Wang TY, Kong S, Tao M, et al. The potential role of RNA n6-methyladenosine in cancer progression[J]. Mol Cancer, 2020, 19(1): 88.
25
He LE, Li HY, Wu AQ, et al. Functions of n6-methyladenosine and its role in cancer[J]. Mol Cancer, 2019, 18(1): 176.
26
Hu BB, Wang XY, Gu XY, et al. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification in gastrointestinal tract cancers: roles, mechanisms, and applications[J]. Mol Cancer, 2019, 18(1): 178.
27
Bechara R, Amatya N, Bailey RD, et al. The m6A reader IMP2 directs autoimmune inflammation through an IL-17- and TNFα-dependent C/EBP transcription factor axis[J]. Sci Immunol, 2021, 6(61): eabd1287.
28
Zong X, Xiao X, Shen B, et al. The N6-methyladenosine RNA-binding protein YTHDF1 modulates the translation of TRAF6 to mediate the intestinal immune response[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021, 49(10): 5537-5552.
29
Du JY, Ji H, Ma S, et al. m6A regulator-mediated methylation modification patterns and characteristics of immunity and stemness in low-grade glioma[J]. Brief Bioinform, 2021, 22(5): bbab013.
30
Li JH, Wang WW, Zhou YB, et al. M6A regulator-associated modification patterns and immune infiltration of the tumor microenvironment in hepatocarcinoma[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2021, 9: 687756.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[3] 吴晖, 佴永军, 施雪松, 魏晓为. 两种解剖入路下行直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 40-43.
[4] 周世振, 朱兴亚, 袁庆港, 刘理想, 王凯, 缪骥, 丁超, 汪灏, 管文贤. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在腹腔镜直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 44-47.
[5] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[8] 郑民华, 蒋天宇, 赵轩, 马君俊. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年发展历程与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 591-595.
[9] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[10] 李明, 屠松, 闫鹏, 钱军, 高鹏程, 许文山, 杨发英, 胡振涛, 单永玮. 应用前列腺电切镜引导置管治疗直肠低位吻合口漏研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 603-606.
[11] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[12] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[13] 吴胜伟, 王志伟, 陈贵进, 刘序, 吴晓翔. 系膜肥厚低位直肠癌患者改良NOSES Ⅰ式手术的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 615-618.
[14] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要