Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (04): 240-245. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2016.04.011

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical application of four kinds of electrophoresis and quantification of serum light chain in dignosis of Multiple Myeloma

Jiajian Wang1, Yurong Zheng2, Nanxun Mo3, Ran Tao1,(), Jianbo Chen3, Chaohui Hu4, Wenwen Li4, Shaohao Yao4, Yunzhen Li4   

  1. 1. Guangzhou Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory, Guangzhou 510330, China
    2. Nanfang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510510, China
    3. Hainan Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory, Haikou 570311, China
    4. Jiangxi Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory, Nanchang 330000, China
  • Received:2016-06-22 Online:2016-11-28 Published:2016-11-28
  • Contact: Ran Tao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tao Ran, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the value of 4 kinds of electrophoresis and quantification of serum light chain in diagnosis and typing of multiple myeloma (MM).

Methods

The serum and urine of 164 cases of multiple myeloma patients and 45 healthy adults (control group) were collected. American HELLENA agarose gel electrophoresis technique was used for Serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), serum protein electrophoresis (SPE), Bence-Jones protein electrophoresis (B-J) and high resolution urinary protein electrophoresis (HR). The levels of immunoglobulin (IgG, IgA and IgG), total protein (TP), and albumin (ALB), globulin (GLOB) and light chain on both groups were measured by Roche biochemical instrument.

Results

In 164 cases of MM patients, the detection rate of the M protein in SPE was 92.68%, the detection rate of the M protein in IFE was 98.17%, the detection rate of the M protein in B-J was 66.46% and the detection rate of the M protein in HR was 59.76%. M protein was not detected in the electrophoresis of the healthy control group. Compared with the healthy control group, MM patients′ content of TP, ALB, IG, light chain κ, λ was significantly increased (t=34.968, 38.231; F=72.811, 58.611; P<0.05). HR and B-J′s positive rates of light chain patients were significantly higher than that of IgA, IgG and IgM patients (χ2=6.870, 13.236, 19.725; P<0.05).

Conclusions

IFE is the most sensitive detection method for MM diagnose. Combination of a variety of electrophoresis methods and simultaneous detection of immunoglobulin and light chain quantitative detection can effectively avoid missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis. The methods provide evidence for comprehensive assessment of the disease on clinic.

Key words: Multiple myeloma, Electrophoresis, Serum light Chain

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-81340564;020-37103504 Fax: 020-37103505 E-mail: clinlab@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd