Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03): 143-148. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2025.03.003

• Experiment Research • Previous Articles    

The value of combining transrectal ultrasound, multiparametric MRI and prostate specific antigen density in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

Jinbing Liu1,2, Wei Gao3, Guobiao Liu4, Mingkun Hu3, Tiefu Xiong3, Xiaofei Ding1, Minling Tang5, Yongyi Cai1,()   

  1. 1 Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Liwan Central Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou Guangdong 510170, China
    2 Faculty of Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao 999078, China
    3 Department of Urology, Liwan Central Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou Guangdong 510170, China
    4 Department of Radiology, Liwan Central Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou Guangdong 510170, China
    5 Department of Medical Education, Liwan Central Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou Guangdong 510170, China
  • Received:2024-09-12 Online:2025-08-28 Published:2025-10-15
  • Contact: Yongyi Cai

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the value of combining transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) and improving the early diagnosis rate.

Methods

The clinical data of 233 patients with suspected PCa were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into 4 diagnostic groups: Group A was TRUS diagnosis group, group B was mpMRI diagnosis group, group C was PSAD diagnosis group, and group D was combined application group. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and Youden index were calculated and compared for each group. Kappa statistics was used to assess the consistency between the diagnostic results and pathological findings, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was compared across groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in age among the four groups (P=0.546). The sensitivity (91%), specificity (85%), accuracy (87%) and Youden index (0.76) of group D were higher than those of group A, group B and group C. The consistency between the diagnostic results of the 4 diagnostic methods and pathological results was statistically significant (all P<0.05). The Kappa value of group D was 0.729, which was higher than that of group A、B、C (Kappa=0.253、0.438、0.447). The AUC of group D was 0.880, which was better than that of group A、B、C (AUC=0.640、0.742、0.770), and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

The combination of TRUS, mpMRI and PSAD significantly improves the diagnostic efficiency of early PCa compared to any single modality.

Key words: prostate cancer, transrectal ultrasound, multiparametric MRI, prostate specific antigen density

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-81341720 Fax: 020-37103505 E-mail: clinlab@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd