切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 240 -244. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2017.04.010

所属专题: 文献

实验研究

两种检测骨髓移植患者环孢素A血药浓度方法的比较
王磊1, 王红春1, 李培余1, 孙文利1, 刘红星1,()   
  1. 1. 065201 河北燕达陆道培医院临床药理室
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-25 出版日期:2017-11-28
  • 通信作者: 刘红星

Comparison of blood concentration monitoring of Cyclosporine A in bone marrow transplant patients by two methods

Lei Wang1, Hongchun Wang1, Peiyu Li1, Wenli Sun1, Hongxing Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hebei Yanda Ludaopei Hospital, Sanhe 065201, China
  • Received:2017-07-25 Published:2017-11-28
  • Corresponding author: Hongxing Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Hongxing, Email:
引用本文:

王磊, 王红春, 李培余, 孙文利, 刘红星. 两种检测骨髓移植患者环孢素A血药浓度方法的比较[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2017, 05(04): 240-244.

Lei Wang, Hongchun Wang, Peiyu Li, Wenli Sun, Hongxing Liu. Comparison of blood concentration monitoring of Cyclosporine A in bone marrow transplant patients by two methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2017, 05(04): 240-244.

目的

探讨化学发光微粒子免疫(chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassays, CMIA)法与电化学发光(Elecsys)法检测骨髓移植患者全血中环孢素A(Cyclosporine A, CSA)浓度的相关性,为临床用药方案调整提供依据。

方法

分别用CMIA法和Elecsys法检测简单随机直抽法收集的骨髓移植患者服药后有效的83份全血标本中CSA水平,并分析两种方法检测CSA的相关性及差异。

结果

CMIA法和Elecsys法检测结果线性相关性方程为Y=1.4618 X-2.2309,相关性较好(r=0.9105);CMIA法测定CSA(195.75 ng/ml)>Elecsys(135.44 ng/ml);CMIA测定CSA的最佳均值为181.97 ng/ml,Elecsys法为117.49 ng/ml。且两种方法检测CSA呈对数正态分布,其换算系数为1.55。据骨髓移植患者CMIA法的临床参考范围150~250 ng/ml,可得Elecsys临床参考范围为100~200 ng/ml。

结论

两种方法检测CSA血药浓度均具有临床应用价值,但结果存在差异,临床调整用药时应注意根据不同的检测方法选用不同的参考区间。

Objective

To discuss the correlation of chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassays and Elecsys for the determination of blood concentration of cyclosporine A (CSA) in bone marrow transplant patients, providing the basis for the adjustment of clinical medication regime.

Methods

Whole blood samples of 83 patients underwent bone marrow transplant were randomly collected and determined by CMIA and Elecsys respectively. The difference and correlation of 2 kinds of determination methods were investigated.

Results

The linear correlation of CMIA and Elecsys results was good and the regression equation was Y=1.4618X-2.2309 (r=0.9105). CSA determination results by CMIA (195.75 ng/ml)>Elecsys(135.44 ng/ml); CSA mean best estimate by CMIA (181.97 ng/ml) and Elecsys(117.49 ng/ml); The results of the two methods are logarithmic normal distribution, and the conversion coefficient is 1.55. According to the clinical reference range (150-250 ng/ml) of CMIA method of bone marrow transplant patients, the clinical reference range of Elecsys was 100-200 ng/ml.

Conclusions

Both methods are feasible for blood concentration monitoring of CSA but there are difference in determination result. Great importance should be paid to CSA monitoring method reference interval in the adjustment of medication method in the clinic.

图1 两种方法检测CSA血药浓度质控图
图2 两种方法测定CSA的结果散点图
图3 两种方法检测CSA浓度结果经对数转换后的频率分布直方图
图4 加权残差(WRES)对CMIA法测定值的散点图(n=83)
1
金锐,王珍,韩毓博,等. 心脏移植患者环孢素A药动学研究[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2009,V44(17):1331-1333.
2
王翔岩,钟旭丽,宋泽亮,等. 儿童造血干细胞移植后环孢素A血药浓度监测[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2015,13(6):21-24.
3
Jorga A, Holt DW, Johnston A. Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine[J]. Transplant Proc, 2004,36(2):396-403.
4
梁晓丽,刘蕾. HPLC-MS/MS和FPIA法测定全血中环孢素浓度的比较方法学[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2009,V44(24):1904-1907.
5
陈文瑛,谢白露,梁峰华,等. 异基因造血干细胞移植术后患者环孢素A群体药动学[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2014,34(9):683-688.
6
Mohamed M, Robertson H, Booth TA, et al. TGF-beta expression inrenal transplant biopsies: a comparative study between cyclosporin-A and tacrolimus[J]. Transplantation, 2000,69(5):1002.
7
张静,王羽,王璐璐,等. 测定环孢素全血浓度的2种方法对比及临床应用[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2011,30(5):374-376.
8
Donatsch P, Abisch E, Homberger M, et al. A radioimmunoassay to measure cyclosporin A in plasma and serum samples[J]. J Immunoassay, 1981,2(1):19-32.
9
Aouichri M, Trabelsi S, Salouage I, et al. Study of the correlation between supra-therapeutic concentrations of cyclosporine and its clinical effects[J]. Toxicol Lett, 2011,205(2):83.
10
贾暖,孙成春,董玉波. 骨髓移植患者术后环孢素血药浓度监测[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析, 2002,12(5):436-437.
11
Yang X. Impact of cyclosporine-A concentration in T cell-replete haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation[J]. Bone Marrow Transpl, 2016,51:361.
12
范芳,谢瑞祥,吴国森. 改良反相高效液相色谱法测定非清髓性异基因干细胞移植患者全血中环孢素A的C2浓度[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2004,24(5):282-283.
13
Maziers N, Bulpa P, Jamart J. Correlations between cyclosporine concentrations at 2 hours post-dose and trough levels with functional outcomes in de novo lung transplant recipients[J]. Transpl P, 2012,44(9):2880-2884.
14
王羽,谢经,乔小云. 肾移植手术后保肝药物对环孢素血浓度的影响[J]. 医药导报, 2014(1):113-115.
15
Singh R, Srivastava A, Kapoor R, et al. Impact of CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 gene polymorphisms on dose requirement of calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, in renal allograft recipients of North India[J]. Naunyn Schmiedeberg′s Arch Pharmacol, 2009,380(2):169-177.
16
朱愿超,梁良,赵明,等. 再生障碍性贫血患者环孢素A血药浓度监测的回顾性分析[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2015,13(5):20-24.
17
Kahan BD. Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine: 20 years of progress[J]. Transplant Proc, 2004,36:378-391.
18
Jebabli N, Klouz A, Bahlous A, et al. Comparison of three methods for cyclosporine therapeutic monitoring[J]. Transplant Proc, 2007,39(8):2557-2559.
19
陈文倩,刘晓,崔刚,等. 对数正态分布在肾移植患者环孢素A谷浓度检测方法比较中的应用[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2014,49(4):329-333.
[1] 施卉, 石晓萍, 陈璋璋, 许青, 崔春晓, 王婷. 基于伏立康唑血药浓度监测治疗肝移植围手术期曲霉感染一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 307-310.
[2] 刘天起, 王东, 厉泉, 李培杰, 毕严斌, 李敏, 许莉, 于建民, 陈善良, 王勇. 原位心脏移植63例临床经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(01): 19-23.
[3] 安阳, 童朝晖, 张睢扬, 张俊迪, 杨玉龙, 姜敏捷, 刘景娇. 优化美罗培南治疗老年脓毒血症的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(05): 661-665.
[4] 金刚, 周倩倩, 王文昊, 刘佳伟, 高军龙, 朱自江. 替加环素治疗老年泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺部术后感染的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(04): 469-471.
[5] 杨丽莎, 刘畅, 胡健, 朱忠立, 徐伟, 祝国芸, 黎俊雅, 李福祥. 替考拉宁药代动力学指导重症G菌感染患者个体化用药的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(01): 53-58.
[6] 李明武, 万荣, 朱惠琼, 刘莎, 范稚坚, 马萌. 不同剂型异烟肼血药浓度监测结果分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(06): 440-443.
[7] 王磊, 孙文利, 陈佳琦, 刘红星. 环孢素A血药浓度监测相关实验室检测研究进展[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2019, 07(02): 65-70.
[8] 王磊, 孙文利, 李培余, 王红春, 刘红星. Elecsys与HPLC-MS/MS检测骨髓移植患者环孢素A血药浓度的相关性及其应用意义[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2018, 06(02): 99-103.
[9] 徐家蓉, 金晖, 潘明麟, 缪珩. 促甲状腺激素即时检测技术的临床诊断价值评估[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2018, 06(04): 277-280.
阅读次数
全文


摘要