切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (03) : 157 -161. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2018.03.006

所属专题: 文献

实验研究

山东东明县23 088名已婚女性宫颈癌筛查结果分析
谢风祥1, 张丽冉2, 王新国2, 赵东曼2, 彭德志2, 毕春蕊2, 姜玲波2, 赵俊艳3, 祁德波2,()   
  1. 1. 250101 济南金域医学检验中心
    3. 250014 济南市历下区人民医院
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-12 出版日期:2018-08-28
  • 通信作者: 祁德波

Analysis of cervical cancer screening results of 23 088 married women in Dongming County, Shandong Province

Fengxiang Xie1, Liran Zhang2, Xinguo Wang2, Dongman Zhao2, Dezhi Peng2, Chunrui Bi2, Lingbo Jiang2, Junyan Zhao3, Debo Qi2,()   

  1. 1. Jinan KingMed Diagnostics, Jinan 250101, China; People′s Hospital of Lixia District, Jinan 250014, China
    2. Jinan KingMed Diagnostics, Jinan 250101, China
    3. People′s Hospital of Lixia District, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2017-10-12 Published:2018-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Debo Qi
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Qi Debo. Email:
引用本文:

谢风祥, 张丽冉, 王新国, 赵东曼, 彭德志, 毕春蕊, 姜玲波, 赵俊艳, 祁德波. 山东东明县23 088名已婚女性宫颈癌筛查结果分析[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2018, 06(03): 157-161.

Fengxiang Xie, Liran Zhang, Xinguo Wang, Dongman Zhao, Dezhi Peng, Chunrui Bi, Lingbo Jiang, Junyan Zhao, Debo Qi. Analysis of cervical cancer screening results of 23 088 married women in Dongming County, Shandong Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(03): 157-161.

目的

分析山东省东明县已婚女性宫颈癌筛查结果,为该地区宫颈癌预防提供科学依据。

方法

回顾性汇总分析2016年9月至2017年6月期间,于济南金域医学检验中心病理室行宫颈癌筛查的东明县23 088名已婚女性的细胞学检测结果。年龄范围为19~90岁,分为5组:<30岁组810例、30~39岁组5174例、40~49岁组9301例、50~59岁组5707例、≥60岁组2096例。同时对其中细胞学异常者随访,得到高危型人乳头状瘤病毒(high-risk human papillomavirus,hrHPV)检测结果61例和组织活检结果438例,进行分析。

结果

23 088名已婚女性经细胞学检测,检出异常细胞学者1177例(5.1%),其中:不能明确判读的非典型鳞状细胞(atypical squamous cells of unknown significance,ASC-US)者729例(3.2%),不能排除高级别鳞状上皮内病变的非典型鳞状细胞(atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL,ASC-H)/非典型腺细胞(atypical glandular cells,AGC)者43例(0.2%),低级别鳞状上皮内病变(low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions,LSIL)者289例(1.3%),高级别鳞状上皮内病变(high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions,HSIL)者116例(0.5%)。随访细胞学异常者hrHPV检测阳性率为50.0%(31/61例),组织活检阳性率为45.6%(200/438例)。不同年龄组间不同异常细胞学病变阳性率比较,ASC-US (χ2=5.502,P=0.019)和LSIL(χ2=3.956,P=0.047)阳性率存在明显差异。ASC-US以50~59岁组197例(3.5%)最高,30~39岁组134例(2.6%)最低;LSIL以<30岁组12例(1.5%)和30~39岁组76例(1.5%)最高,50~59岁组50例(0.9%)最低。不同细胞学病变的组织活检结果有明显差异。活检正常者(χ2=113.536,P<0.001)在ASC-US中所占比(75.4%)最高,而HSIL所占比(9.8%)最低;活检结果为宫颈上皮内瘤变1(cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,CIN1) (χ2=37.817,P<0.001)在LSIL所占比(44.4%)最高,而HSIL所占比(6.6%)最低;活检结果为CIN2/3/原位腺癌(adenocarcinoma in situ,AIS) /鳞状细胞癌(squamous cell carcinoma,SCC) (χ2=603.863,P<0.001)则在ASC-US中所占比(4.0%)最低,而HSIL所占比(83.6%)最高。不同细胞学病变(χ2=7.946,P=0.019)和组织学活检结果(χ2=3.925,P=0.048)的hrHPV阳性率也有明显差异。ASC-US/ASC-H/AGC、LSIL和HSIL的阳性率分别为34.5%、58.3%和87.5%;组织学活检正常、CIN1和CIN2/3/AIS/SCC的阳性率分别为37.5%、60.0%和75.0%。

结论

细胞学筛查能有效地发现癌前病变和宫颈癌,且细胞学病变的严重程度、hrHPV的阳性率高低与组织学活检结果的严重程度有较好的一致性,这能为制定该地区宫颈癌筛查策略提供一定依据。

Objective

To analyze the cervical cancer screening results of married women in Dongming County of Shandong Province, and to provide scientific evidence for cervical cancer prevention in this region.

Methods

A retrospective study on the cytological results of 23 088 married women in Dongming County, from September 2016 to June 2017 was performed. Cervical swabs of 23 088 married women were referred to Jinan KingMed Diagnostics. The age of these married women is 19~90 years old. They were divided into 5 groups: 810 cases in group<30 years old, 5174 cases in group 30~39, 9301 cases in group 40~49, 5707 cases in group 50~59 and 2096 cases in group of over 60 years old. At the same time, 61 cases of high risk human papillomavirus (high-risk human papillomavirus, hrHPV) and 438 cases of abnormal cytology with tissue biopsy were followed up, and analyzed.

Results

A total of 1177 women (5.1%) were interpreted as cytological abnormalities, including 729 cases (3.2%) of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASC-US), 43 cases (0.2%) of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H)/atypical glandular cells (AGC), 289 cases (1.3%) of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and 116 cases (0.5%) of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Of these cases with abnormal cytological results, 31 cases (50%) had hrHPV testing positive, and 200 cases (45.6%) had follow-up histological positive. The positive rates of ASC-US (χ2=5.502, P=0.019) and LSIL (χ2=3.956, P=0.047) significantly varied among different age groups. The highest positive rate of ASC-US was found in the 50~59 years old group (197 cases, 3.5%), while the lowest positive rate was found in the 30~39 years old group (134 cases, 2.6%). The highest positive rate of LSIL was observed in<30 (12 cases) and 30~39 (76 cases) years old groups (1.5% for both groups), while the lowest positive rate was observed in the 50~59 years old group (50 cases, 0.9%). Histopathologic follow-ups demonstrated obvious variations in different cytological results. Normal biopsy (χ2=113.536, P<0.001) accounted for the highest proportion in ASC-US (75.4%) and the lowest proportion in HSIL (9.8%); cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1(CIN1) (χ2=37.817, P<0.001) was the most frequent in LSIL, but the least frequent in HSIL; CIN2/3/AIS/SCC (χ2=603.863, P<0.001) was the most common in HSIL but the least common in ASC-US. Significant variations in hrHPV testing were also observed in different cytological abnormalities (χ2=7.946, P=0.019) and different histopathologic results (χ2=3.925, P=0.048). The hrHPV-positive rates were 34.5%, 58.3% and 87.5% for ASC-US/ASC-H/AGC, LSIL and HSIL, respectively, and 37.5%, 60% and 75% for normal biopsy, CIN1 and CIN2/3/AIS/SCC, respectively.

Conclusions

The present study showed that cervical cytology screening can effectively detect cervical invasive cancer and its precancerous lesions. The severity of cytological abnormalities and the hrHPV-positive rates correlated well with the severity of histological abnormal findings. These results can provide a scientific basis for establishing cervical cancer screening strategies in this region.

表1 不同年龄组检出异常细胞学阳性率分布[例(%)]
表2 61例不同细胞学异常结果的hrHPV检测结果分布
表3 438例细胞学结果异常的组织学活检结果分布[例(%)]
表4 不同活检结果女性的hrHPV检测结果
1
Ferlay J,Shin HR,Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008[J]. Int J Cancer, 2010,127(12): 2893-2917.
2
Greenlee RT,Hill-Harmon MB,Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2001[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2001,51(1):15-36.
3
Arbyn M,Rebolj M,De Kok IM, et al. The challenges of organising cervical screening programmes in the 15 old member states of the European Union[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009,45(15):2671-2678.
4
Adegoke O,Kulasingam S,Virning B. Cervical cancer trends in United States: a 35-year population-based analysis[J]. J Womens Health (Larchmt), 2012,21(10):1031-1037.
5
de Martel C,Ferlay J,Franceschi S, et al. Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: a review and synthetic analysis[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012,13(6):607-615.
6
Crosbie EJ,Einstein MH,Franceschi S, et al. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer[J]. Lancet, 2013,382(9895):889-899.
7
de Sanjose S,Quint WG,Alemany L, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010,11(11):1048-1056.
8
Zhang L,Xie F,Wang X, et al. Previous cervical cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus testing in a cohort of patients with invasive cervical carcinoma in Shandong Province, China[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(6):e180618.
9
Huh WK,Ault KA,Chelmow D, et al. Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2015,136(2):178-182.
10
张丽冉,谢凤祥,王新国, 等. 传统涂片与液基细胞学筛查宫颈癌阳性率的差异分析与临床意义[J/CD]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2017,5(2):98-102.
11
张丽冉,王新国,谢凤祥, 等. 兰陵地区子宫颈液基细胞学筛查结果分析[J]. 中国癌症防治杂志, 2015,7(4):255-259.
12
Davey DD,Naryshkin S,Nielsen ML, et al. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors[J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 1994,11(4):390-396.
13
Zheng B,Yang H,Li Z, et al. HPV test results and histological follow-upresults of patients with LSIL cervical cytology from the largest CAP-certified laboratory in China[J]. J Cancer, 2017,8(13):2436-2441.
14
Zheng B,Austin RM,Liang X, et al. PPV of an HSIL cervical cytology result in China′s largest CAP-certified laboratory[J]. J Am Soc Cytopathol, 2015,4(2):84-89.
15
吕永金,谢沁玲,郑宝文, 等. 子宫颈癌筛查大样本数据引发的思考[J/CD]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2016,4(1):8-12.
16
Schiffman M,Castle PE,Jeronimo J, et al. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer[J]. Lancet, 2007,370(9590):890-907.
17
Maucort-Boulch D,Franceschi S,Plummer M. International correlation between human papillomavirus prevalence and cervical cancer incidence[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2008,17(3): 717-720.
18
Di J,Rutherford S,Chu C. Review of the cervical cancer burden and population-based cervical cancer screening in China[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2015,16(17):7401-7407.
19
Shi JF,Canfell K,Lew JB, et al. The burden of cervical cancer in China: Synthesis of the evidence[J]. Int J Cancer, 2012,130(3):641-652.
20
田欣欣,姜玲波,张丽冉, 等. 山东省4161例女性人乳头状瘤病毒感染及其亚型分析[J/CD]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2017,5(3):176-182.
21
张丽冉,王睿,王新国, 等. 山东省女性高危型人乳头状瘤病毒感染的检测分析[J]. 中国癌症防治杂志, 2016,8(1):38-43.
22
王睿,卜范峰,田欣欣, 等. 山东地区女性人乳头瘤病毒感染亚型、多重感染情况及年龄分布差异[J]. 中国生物制品学杂志, 2016,29(1):57-60.
23
Bi Q,Zhang L,Zhao Z, et al. Human papillomavirus prevalence and genotypes distribution among female outpatients in Qingdao, East China[J]. J Med Virol, 2015,87(12):2114-2121.
24
Wang R,Guo XL,Wisman GB, et al. Nationwide prevalence of human papillomavirus infection and viral genotype distribution in 37 cities in China[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2015,15:257.
25
Zhang L,Bi Q,Deng H, et al. Human papillomavirus infections among women with cervical lesions and cervical cancer in Eastern China: genotype-specific prevalence and attribution[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2017,17(1):107.
26
Massad LS,Einstein MH,Huh WK, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2013,121(4):829-846.
[1] 旺久, 陈军, 朱霞, 米玛央金, 赵胜, 陈欣林, 李建华, 王双. 山南市妇幼保健院开展胎儿系统超声筛查的效果分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 728-733.
[2] 危玲, 李会, 陈奕. 孕产妇产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌定植/感染与母婴传播研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 517-521.
[3] 张浩霖, 张旭, 梁昆, 金作林, 高洁. 儿童腺样体肥大的诊断与筛查技术进展现状[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 123-127.
[4] 高延庆, 韩菲, 朱怀军, 宋鹏, 陶亮, 管文贤, 卞晓洁. 胃癌手术患者营养风险筛查和评估适用性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 167-171.
[5] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[6] 李小娟, 李炜佳, 彭凌燕, 周鹏莹, 李桂娥, 刘相辰. 体检人群中前列腺钙化灶的检出率及临床特征分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 336-338.
[7] 孙文琦, 吴欣荣, 王运荣, 赵贝, 窦晓坛, 李雯, 邹晓平, 王雷, 陈敏. 结直肠上皮细胞ROS及FH检测对结直肠癌筛查的应用价值[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 326-330.
[8] 鄂一民, 孙司正, 范小彧, 喻春钊. 结直肠癌粪便筛查的现状与展望[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 331-336.
[9] 刘骞, 崔巍, 高亦博, 张泽跃, 李典格, 王治杰, 王洁, 赫捷, 中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南制定专家组. 结直肠肿瘤早诊筛查新策略:基于液体活检技术的筛查方案[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 17-20.
[10] 李京珂, 张妍春, 武佳懿, 任秀瑜. 深度学习在糖尿病视网膜病变筛查、评级及管理中的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 241-246.
[11] 李文捷, 卢弘. 幼年特发性关节炎相关葡萄膜炎的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 40-44.
[12] 宗晨曦, 肖林, 宋红欣. 人工智能视力筛查在近视眼防控中的应用研究与展望[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(01): 60-64.
[13] 李雪珠, 谢剑锋, 李晓青, 夏泽燕, 鲁玲, 顾晓霞, 马绍磊, 黄英姿. 循环式筛查与五色区域分类模式在方舱医院管理中的应用[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 316-320.
[14] 蒋辛, 潘纯, 黄文辉, 甘桂芬. 西宁地区某三甲医院ICU 耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌主动筛查与感染的单中心研究[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 178-184.
[15] 刘平娟, 罗科城, 吴家茵, 廖康, 胡雯雯, 陈怡丽. 神经内科重症监护室患者肠道耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌目细菌主动筛查研究[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 235-240.
阅读次数
全文


摘要