切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 105 -109. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2021.02.009

所属专题: 文献

质量控制

基于六西格玛模式评价血常规项目的分析性能及质控策略的设计
刘倩1, 付梅1, 姚丽1, 孙瑾1, 梁伟1, 杨伏猛1,()   
  1. 1. 222006 江苏连云港,连云港市第二人民医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-20 出版日期:2021-05-28
  • 通信作者: 杨伏猛
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫健委科研面上项目(M2020079); 江苏省连云港市卫生科研计划项目(201817); 南京医科大学康达学院科研发展基金重点项目(KD2019KYJJZD010)

Application of six sigma model to evaluate the analytical performance of hematology analytes and the design of quality control strategy

Qian Liu1, Mei Fu1, Li Yao1, Jin Sun1, Wei Liang1, Fumeng Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang Jiangsu 222006, China
  • Received:2020-08-20 Published:2021-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Fumeng Yang
引用本文:

刘倩, 付梅, 姚丽, 孙瑾, 梁伟, 杨伏猛. 基于六西格玛模式评价血常规项目的分析性能及质控策略的设计[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 105-109.

Qian Liu, Mei Fu, Li Yao, Jin Sun, Wei Liang, Fumeng Yang. Application of six sigma model to evaluate the analytical performance of hematology analytes and the design of quality control strategy[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(02): 105-109.

目的

应用六西格玛(6σ)模式评价血常规项目的分析性能,并建立血常规项目个性化的质控方案和质量改进措施。

方法

收集本实验室血常规项目2020年江苏省卫健委临检中心室间质评数据及同期室内质控数据,以“适当”生物学变异导出的质量规范作为实验室允许总误差(TEa),计算各项目的σ值,同时应用标准化的σ性能验证图进行标示。并依据具有批长度的Westgard西格玛规则和质量目标指数(QGI),分别制定各项目个性化的室内质控方案和质量改进措施。

结果

以生物学变异数据作为质量目标,白细胞计数(WBC)项目的分析性能达到“世界一流”水平,其余项目则处于“临界”至“优秀”之间。依据具有批长度的Westgard西格玛规则,WBC项目选择13s规则(N=2)且分析批长度为1 000个患者的样本作为其室内质控方案;红细胞计数(RBC)项目选择13s/22s/R4s/41s多规则(N=4)且分析批长度为200个患者的样本作为其室内质控方案;血红蛋白(Hb)项目选择13s/22s/R4s多规则(N=2)且分析批长度为450个患者的样本作为其室内质控方案;血细胞比容(HCT)和血小板计数(PLT)项目选择13s/22s/R4s/41s/6X多规则(N=6)且分析批长度为45个患者的样本作为其室内质控方案。此外,Hb和HCT需要优先改进精密度;RBC和PLT则需同时改进精密度和正确度。

结论

6σ模式能够客观评价临床血常规项目分析性能,其在帮助实验室质控策略的设计和质量改进方面具有重要的指导意义。

Objective

Application of six sigma model to evaluate the analytical performance of hematology analytes, aims to establish a personalized quality control schemes and quality improvement measures for hematology analytes.

Methods

The data of external quality assessment (EQA) of hematology analytes from Jiangsu center for clinical laboratories in 2020 and its internal quality control (IQC) results were collected. And the quality specification derived from the "desirable" biological variation was used as allowable total error (TEa) to calculate the sigma value of each item. Meanwhile, analytical performance of each item was demonstrated on the standardized sigma performance verification chart. According to the Westgard sigma rules with batch length and the quality goal index (QGI), personalized IQC schemes and quality improvement measures for each item were formulated respectively.

Results

With biological variation data as laboratory quality goal, the analytical performance of the WBC reached the "world-class" level, while the remaining projects ranged from "marginal" to "excellent". According to the Westgard sigma rules with batch length, 13s rule (N=2) with batch length of 1 000 patient samples was selected as IQC scheme for WBC. Multi-rules of 13s/22s/R4s/41s (N=4) with batch length of 200 patient samples was selected as IQC scheme for RBC. Multi-rules of 13s/22s/R4s (N=2) with batch length of 450 patient samples was selected as IQC scheme for Hb. Multi-rules of 13s/22s/R4s/41s/6x (N=6) with batch length of 45 patient samples was selected as IQC scheme for HCT and PLT. In addition, based on the calculation of QGI, Hb and HCT need priority to improve the precision; While RBC and PLT need to improve both precision and accuracy at the same time.

Conclusions

The six sigma model can objectively evaluate the analysis performance of clinical hematology analytes, which has important guiding significance in helping the design of laboratory quality control strategies and quality improvement.

图1 血常规项目的σ性能验证图
表1 临床血常规项目的σ水平
图2 具有批长度的Westgard西格玛规则
表2 血常规项目质量改进方案(σ值<6)
1
Westgard S, Bayat H, Westgard JO. Analytical Sigma metrics:A review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories[J]. Biochem Med (Zagreb), 2018, 28(2):020502.
2
赵海建, 张传宝, 周伟燕, 等. 应用六西格玛管理方法评价脂类检验项目质量水平[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2014, 37(4):311-314.
3
Wang B, Mu XL, Zhao J, et al. Effects of lifestyle interventions on rural patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[J]. World J Diabetes, 2020, 11(6):261-268.
4
Yang F, Wang W, Liu Q, et al. The application of Six Sigma to perform quality analyses of plasma proteins[J]. Ann Clin Biochem, 2020, 57(2):121-127.
5
Wang X, Wen D, Wang W, et al. Application of biological variation and six sigma models to evaluate analytical quality of six HbA1c analyzers and design quality control strategy[J]. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol, 2019, 47(1):3598-3602.
6
Đido V, Ćorić J, Mujić J, et al. Determination of Six Sigma Metric in Control of Enzymes Determination in Human Serum[J]. Clin Lab, 2019; 65(7).
7
Taher J, Cosme J, Renley BA, et al. A novel Sigma metric encompasses global multi-site performance of 18 assays on the Abbott Alinity system[J]. Clin Biochem, 2019, 63:106-112.
8
王治国. 临床检验质量控制技术[M]. 第3版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014:742-769.
9
肖亚玲, 王薇, 赵海建, 等. 西格玛性能验证图在常规化学检测项目性能评价中的应用[J]. 现代检验医学杂志, 2016, 31(4):159-162.
10
Liu Q, Fu M, Yang F, et al. Application of Six Sigma for evaluating the analytical quality of tumor marker assays[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2019, 33(2):e22682.
11
郭俊超, 袁达. 我国肿瘤精准治疗的现状和思考[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2016, 54(7):485-487.
12
宋菁, 胡永华. 精准医疗:分子流行病学的机遇与挑战[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2016, 37(4):587-592.
13
Zarkesh M, Sedaghat F, Heidarzadeh A, et al. Diagnostic value of IL-6, CRP, WBC, and absolute neutrophil count to predict serious bacterial infection in febrile infants[J]. Acta Med Iran, 2015, 53(7):408-411.
14
Li Y, Fan F, Jia J, et al. WBC count predicts the risk of new-onset peripheral arterial disease in a Chinese community-based population[J]. Hypertens Res, 2017, 40(11):932-936.
15
Westgard JO, Westgard SA. The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2006, 125(3):343-354.
16
Zhou B, Wu Y, He H, et al. Practical application of Six Sigma management in analytical biochemistry processes in clinical settings[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2020, 34(1):e23126.
17
刘倩, 王西珍, 张子龄, 等. 六西格玛在评价内分泌项目分析性能上的应用[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2020, 8(1):36-40.
18
Westgard S, Petrides V, Schneider S, et al. Assessing precision, bias and sigma-metrics of 53 measurands of the Alinity ci system[J]. Clin Biochem, 2017, 50:1216-1221.
19
Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Establishing Evidence-Based Statistical Quality Control Practices[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2019, 151(4):364-370.
20
费阳, 王薇, 王治国. Westgard西格玛规则在临床血液学检验项目室内质量控制规则选择中的应用[J]. 检验医学, 2016, 31(11):993-996.
[1] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[2] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[3] 方晔, 谢晓红, 罗辉. 品管圈在提高前列腺癌穿刺检出率中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 722-727.
[4] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[5] 吕衡, 董理聪, 谢海琴, 赵卓非, 刘俐, 孙德胜. 基于CT-超声对照的肝脏局灶性病变超声漏诊状况分析:一项单中心横断面质量控制调查报告[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 712-716.
[6] 钟露, 曹省, 宋宏宁, 陈金玲, 周青. 超声心动图定量评估二尖瓣反流程度的质量控制[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 705-711.
[7] 武玺宁, 张培培, 齐振红, 张璟, 赵瑞娜, 孟华, 李建初. 腹膜后神经鞘瘤的超声诊断质量及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 701-704.
[8] 刘会, 郑宇觐, 郭丹丹, 张波. 标准切面质量控制在Ⅲ级产科超声检查胎儿结构异常检出中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(03): 337-342.
[9] 卓秋銮, 卫红艳, 姜新魁, 邓世华, 江宁珠, 黄翠平, 范丽萍, 庞慧贤, 张海燕, 姜伟. 双闭环管理人工智能质量控制模式在产前超声切面质量控制中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(01): 90-96.
[10] 谭莹, 文华轩, 彭桂艳, 罗丹丹, 温昕, 江瑶, 黄文兰, 李胜利. 在线产科超声图像智能质量控制系统的临床应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(07): 649-655.
[11] 张一休, 武玺宁, 孝梦甦, 姜英姿, 王亚红, 李建初, 赵峻. 基于虚拟超声模型的腹部超声图像客观化评分的质量控制[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(07): 644-648.
[12] 朱兆领, 张小林, 甘宜鑫, 黄蓉, 邵黎阳, 王睿丽, 袁建军. 河南省盆底超声检查开展情况调查分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(07): 639-643.
[13] 陆爱美, 马苏亚, 谢晓红, 朱玲斐, 王琴, 吴明月. 品管圈在肝声触诊弹性成像标准化改进中的应用效果[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(07): 633-638.
[14] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[15] 刘佳, 李梦伊, 刘洋, 田沛荣, 边识博, 张鹏, 张忠涛. 减重与代谢外科临床数据规范化管理与实践[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 15-19.
阅读次数
全文


摘要