切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 6 -12. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2022.01.002

实验研究

血小板/中性粒细胞比值和超氧化物歧化酶对急性缺血性脑卒中的诊疗价值
马新1, 地娜拉木·巴克尔2, 柴树红1,()   
  1. 1. 830049 新疆乌鲁木齐,乌鲁木齐市友谊医院检验科
    2. 830049 新疆乌鲁木齐,乌鲁木齐市友谊医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-22 出版日期:2022-02-28
  • 通信作者: 柴树红

The value of platelet/neutrophil ratio and superoxide dismutase in the diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Xin Ma1, Baker Dinaram2, Shuhong Chai1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Laboratory, Urumqi Friendship Hospital, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 830049, China.
    2. Department of Neurology, Urumqi Friendship Hospital, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 830049, China
  • Received:2021-06-22 Published:2022-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Shuhong Chai
引用本文:

马新, 地娜拉木·巴克尔, 柴树红. 血小板/中性粒细胞比值和超氧化物歧化酶对急性缺血性脑卒中的诊疗价值[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 6-12.

Xin Ma, Baker Dinaram, Shuhong Chai. The value of platelet/neutrophil ratio and superoxide dismutase in the diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(01): 6-12.

目的

探究血小板/中性粒细胞比值(PNR)和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)在急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者病情早期评估和预后效果预判中的临床意义。

方法

选取2020年6月至2021年6月期间于新疆乌鲁木齐市友谊医院脑卒中心住院接受阿替普酶(rt-PA)静脉溶栓治疗的AIS患者49例,收集相关临床资料。根据美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分将患者分为轻度组、中重度组,通过检测外周血PNR、SOD实验指标,统计分析溶栓前PNR、SOD与AIS患者NIHSS评分之间的相关性从而评估患者病情。采用ROC曲线确定接受rt-PA静脉溶栓后24 h患者PNR、SOD水平对不同AIS患者接受rt-PA溶栓效果良好结局的预测能力。通过并联、串联试验原则分析溶栓后PNR、SOD联合试验诊断AIS预后良好的灵敏度和特异度。

结果

患者入院NIHSS评分与溶栓前PNR指标呈正相关(R=0.630,P<0.001),和SOD指标呈负相关(R=-0.281,P<0.001);轻度AIS组PNR指标水平低于中重度AIS组,SOD指标水平高于中重度AIS组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001,P<0.01)。通过评估溶栓后PNR和SOD对AIS患者短期预后的ROC曲线,发现PNR的良好结局预测能力有一定准确性(AUC=0.833,95% CI= 0.712~0.955),cut-off值为30.705%,灵敏度为0.867,特异度为0.789,约登指数为1.656;SOD的良好结局预测能力有一定准确性(AUC=0.723,95% CI=0.555~0.890),cut-off值为195.850 U/ml,灵敏度为0.833,特异度为0.579,约登指数为1.512。PNR与SOD并联试验的敏感度提高为93.3%;串联试验的特异度提高为84.2%。

结论

PNR、SOD指标能有效、客观评估AIS患者病情严重程度。溶栓后PNR、SOD指标能为AIS患者4.5 h内的rt-PA静脉溶栓良好预后提供具有一定敏感度、特异度的早期血液指标。

Objective

To explore the clinical significance of platelet/neutrophil ratio (PNR) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) detection in early assessment and prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Methods

A total of 49 patients with acute ischemic stroke who received intravenous thrombolytic therapy with alteplase (rt-PA) in Department of Neurology of Urumqi Friendship Hospital from June 2020 to June 2021 were selected to collecte the relevant clinical data. According to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, the patients were divided into mild group and moderate and severe group. By testing PNR and SOD experimental indicators , The correlation between PNR、SOD and AIS patient NIHSS score before thrombolytic was statistically analyzed to evaluate the patient's condition. The ROC curve was used to determine the predictive ability of PNR and SOD levels 24 hours after intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (rt-PA) to predict the good outcome of rt-PA in patients with different AIS.

Results

The NIHSS score was positively correlated with PNR index before thrombolysis (R=0.630, P<0.001) and negatively correlated with SOD index (R=-0.281, P<0.001). The level of PNR index in moderate AIS group was lower than that in severe AIS group, and the level of SOD index was higher than that in severe AIS group (P<0.001, P<0.01). By evaluating the ROC curve of SOD, PNR and short-term prognosis of AIS patients after thrombolysis, it was found that PNR had certain accuracy in predicting good outcome (AUC=0.833, 95%CI=0.712-0.955), the cut-off value was 30.705%, the sensitivity was 0.867, the specificity was 0.789, and the Youden index was 1.656. The predictive ability of SOD was accurate (AUC=0.723, 95%CI=0.555-0.890), and the cut-off value was 195.850 U/ml. The sensitivity, specificity and Youden index were 0.833, 0.579 and 1.512, respectively.

Conclusions

PNR and SOD indexes can effectively and objectively evaluate the severity of AIS patients. PNR and SOD indexes after thrombolytic therapy can provide early blood indicators with certain sensitivity and specificity for the good prognosis of RT-PA intravenous thrombolytic therapy in AIS patients within 4.5 hours.

表1 轻度AIS组和中重度AIS组AIS患者各项基线临床指标的比较
图1 入院NIHSS评分与溶栓前PNR、SOD指标之间的相关性
表2 PNR、SOD指标溶栓前后水平比较
图2 轻度AIS组与中重度AIS组间PNR、SOD比较注:aP<0.001;bP<0.01
图3 PNR、SOD指标对AIS患者预后良好的ROC曲线
表3 PNR、SOD联合试验诊断AIS预后良好的敏感度和特异度
1
刘玉华, 郭富强, 王建红, 等. 中老年急性缺血性脑卒中患者共病状态与卒中后功能恢复的相关性研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2020, 23(4): 453-458.
2
邓梅. 阿替普酶溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的护理探讨[J]. 人人健康, 2020, (2): 135-136.
3
龙本汉, 周禹富, 王振燕. 用阿替普酶对急性缺血性脑卒中患者进行静脉溶栓治疗的效果及安全性分析[J]. 当代医药论丛, 2020, 18(2): 131-132.
4
彭斌, 吴波. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2018, 51(9): 666-682.
5
Tian C, Cao X, Wang J. Recanalisation therapy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke caused by large artery occlusion: Choice of therapeutic strategy according to underlying aetiological mechan-ism[J]. Stroke Vasc Neurol, 2017, 2(4): 244-250.
6
Spronk HMH, De Jong AM, Verheule S, et al. Hypercoagulability causes atrial fibrosis and promotes atrial fibrillation[J]. Eur Heart J, 2017, 38(1): 38-50.
7
Zhang YF, Jiang L, Yang P, et al. Comparison of lymphocyte count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in predicting the severity and the clinical outcomes of acute cerebral infarction patients[J]. Clin Lab, 2019, 65(7): 1277-1283.
8
Malhotra K, Goyal N, Chang JJ, et al. Differential leukocyte counts on admission predict outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2018, 25(12): 1417-1424.
9
Pektezel MY, Yilmaz E, Arsava EM, et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio and response to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2019, 28(7): 1853-1859.
10
任德成, 杜冠华, 张均田. 总丹酚酸对脑缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用[J]. 中国药理学通报, 2002, (3): 275-277.
11
Hinkle Janice L. Reliability and validity of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for neuroscience nurses[J]. Stroke, 2014, 45(3): e32-e34.
12
Sulter G, Steen C, De Keyser J. Use of the barthel index and modified rankin scale in acute stroke trials[J]. Stroke, 1999, 30(8): 1538-1541.
13
Yusuf Inanc, Yilmaz Inanc. The effects of neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratios on prognosis in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke[J]. Ann Ital Chir, 2018, 89: 367-373.
14
Semerano A, Laredo C, Zhao Y, et al. Leukocytes, collateral circulation, and reperfusion in ischemic stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy[J]. Stroke, 2019, 50(12): 3456-3464.
15
Huang Y, Chen S, Luo Y, et al. Crosstalk between Inflammation and the BBB in Stroke[J]. Curr Neuropharmacol, 2020, 18(12): 1227-1236.
16
Kang L, Yu H, Yang X, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps released by neutrophils impair revascularization and vascular remodeling after stroke[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 2488.
17
Weisenburger-Lile D, Dong Y, Yger M, et al. Harmful neutrophil subsets in patients with ischemic stroke: Association with disease severity[J]. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm, 2019, 6(4): e571.
18
Furlan JC, Vergouwen MDI, Fang J, et al. White blood cell count is an independent predictor of outcomes after acute ischaemic stroke[J]. Eur J Neurol, 2014, 21(2): 215-222.
19
Zheng XW, Zeng NM, Wang AL, et al. Prognostic value of white blood cell in acute ischemic stroke patients[J]. Curr Neurovasc Res, 2018, 15(2): 151-157.
20
Franco AT, Corken A, Ware J. Platelets at the interface of thrombosis, inflammation, and cancer[J]. Blood, 2015, 126(5): 582-588.
21
Estevez B, Du XP. New concepts and mechanisms of platelet activation signaling[J]. Physiology (Bethesda, Md.), 2017, 32(2): 162-177.
22
Li J, Kim K, Barazia A, et al. Platelet-neutrophil interactions under thromboinflammatory conditions[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2015, 72(14): 2627-2643.
23
Ritter LS, Orozco JA, Coull BM, et al. Leukocyte accumulation and hemodynamic changes in the cerebral microcirculation during early reperfusion after stroke[J]. Stroke, 2000, 31(5): 1153-1161.
24
Lisman T. Platelet-neutrophil interactions as drivers of inflammatory and thrombotic disease[J]. Cell Tissue Res, 2018, 371(3): 567-576.
25
Balta S, Ozturk C. The platelet-lymphocyte ratio: A simple, inexpensive and rapid prognostic marker for cardiovascular events[J]. Platelets, 2015, 26(7): 680-681.
26
辛续丽, 杨桂花, 胡梅, 等. 高脂血症人群血清超氧化物歧化酶的变化趋势[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2013, 20 (4): 225-228.
27
Kumar A, Khushboo , Pandey R, et al. Modulation of superoxide dismutase activity by mercury, lead, and arsenic[J]. Biol Trace Elem Res, 2020, 196(2): 654-661.
28
Huang HF, Guo F, Cao YZ, et al. Neuroprotection by manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) mimics: Antioxidant effect and oxidative stress regulation in acute experimental stroke[J]. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2012, 18(10): 811-818.
29
Sbodio JI, Snyder SH, Paul BD. Redox mechanisms in neurodegeneration: From disease outcomes to therapeutic opportunities[J]. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2019, 30(11): 1450-1499.
30
Wu XL, Piña-Crespo J, Zhang YW, et al. Tau-mediated neurodegeneration and potential implications in diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimer's disease[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2017, 130(24): 2978-2990.
31
Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J]. Stroke, 2018, 49(3): 46-110.
[1] 李亚龙, 王星童, 申传安. 异体富血小板血浆在创面修复中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 541-545.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[8] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[9] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[10] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[11] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[12] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 耿晓坤. 缺血性卒中后无效再灌注的时间窗、组织窗与神经保护[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 636-636.
阅读次数
全文


摘要