切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 153 -159. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2022.03.006

信息化与自动化

国际急诊预检分诊热点可视化分析
吴伟铭1, 朱永城1, 龚韩湘1, 李艳玲1, 李敏1, 茅海峰1, 莫均荣1, 江慧琳1,()   
  1. 1. 510260 广东广州,广州医科大学附属第二医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-14 出版日期:2022-08-28
  • 通信作者: 江慧琳
  • 基金资助:
    广东省普通高校重点领域专项(2020ZDZX3014); 广州市急诊医学重点学科(2021-2023)

Visualization analysis of hot topics in international emergency pre-examination triage

Weiming Wu1, Yongcheng Zhu1, Hanxiang Gong1, Yanling Li1, Ming Li1, Haifeng Mao1, Junrong Mo1, Huilin Jiang1,()   

  1. 1. Emergency Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510260, China
  • Received:2021-12-14 Published:2022-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Huilin Jiang
引用本文:

吴伟铭, 朱永城, 龚韩湘, 李艳玲, 李敏, 茅海峰, 莫均荣, 江慧琳. 国际急诊预检分诊热点可视化分析[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 153-159.

Weiming Wu, Yongcheng Zhu, Hanxiang Gong, Yanling Li, Ming Li, Haifeng Mao, Junrong Mo, Huilin Jiang. Visualization analysis of hot topics in international emergency pre-examination triage[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(03): 153-159.

目的

通过文献计量方法,定量和定性地预测预检分诊研究活动的热点话题,为急诊分诊领域研究提供借鉴。

方法

通过检索Web of Science数据库中2016年1月至2020年12月国际急诊分诊研究的相关文献,利用文献计量学的方法绘制可视化图谱。

结果

共检索得到发表文献2880篇,急诊预检分诊的研究数量总体上呈现逐年增加趋势,开展该领域研究最多的国家是美国,中介中心性为0.58,最多的研究机构是卡罗林斯卡学院,中介中心性为0.28。大血管阻塞、Manchester预检分诊系统一直都是该领域的研究热点。新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)流行是近期的研究热点。

结论

大血管闭塞导致的危重症疾病,如急性心肌梗死、急性脑卒中的预后一直是急诊预检分诊领域的重点与热点,利用信息技术进行COVID-19患者的预检分诊可能成为新的研究热点。

Objective

This study aims to quantitatively and qualitatively predict the hot topics of triage research activities through bibliometrical methods, and provide references for research in the field of emergency triage.

Methods

The literature related to international emergency triage studies from January 2016 to December 2020 was retrieved from the Web of Science database, the bibliometrical methods was used to draw the visual map.

Results

A total of 2880 published literatures were retrieved. The number of studies on emergency pre-triage showed an increasing trend annually, and the United States was the country that has carried out the most research in this field. Great vascular obstruction and Manchester Triage System have always been the research hotspots in this field. In addition, the epidemic of COVID-19 is the recent research hotspot.

Conclusions

The prognosis of critical diseases caused by large vessel occlusion, such as acute myocardial infarction and acute stroke, has always been the focus and hotspot in the field of emergency pre-triage, and the use of information technology for pre-triage of COVID-19 patients may become a new research hotspot.

图1 2016-2020年急诊分诊领域发表学术论文数量及增长趋势图
表1 急诊分诊研究发表论文最多的前10个国家和机构
图2 参与急诊分诊研究的国家及机构共现图谱 注:最上方条带代表时间轴,与节点颜色对应,节点大小代表词频多少,节点间的连线粗细代表共现关系强弱;2A:国家共现图谱;2B:机构共现图谱
图3 急诊分诊研究被引关键词突现性图谱 注:按暴发持续时间排序,关键词突变时间段用红色区域显示,红色区域长短代表热度持续时间长短
图4 急诊分诊研究关键词共现图谱及急诊分诊研究共被引文献聚类图谱 注:4A:关键词共现简谱,节点代表关键词,节点大小代表词频多少,颜色区域代表聚类;4B:文献聚类图谱,节点代表文献,节点间连线代表共被引关系,颜色区域代表聚类
1
Pan C, Pang JJ, Cheng K, et al. Trends and challenges of emergency and acute care in Chinese mainland: 2005-2017[J]. World J Emerg Med, 2021, 12(1): 5-11.
2
Holroyd BR, Bullard MJ, Latoszek K, et al. Impact of a triage liaison physician on emergency department overcrowding and throughput: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Acad Emerg Med, 2007, 14(8): 702-708.
3
Dang Q, Luo Z, Ouyang C, et al. First systematic review on health communication using the citespace software in china: exploring its research hotspots and frontiers[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(24): 13008.
4
苏玲敏, 张茂. 急诊预检分诊的现状与展望[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2012(12): 1406-1408.
5
Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, et al. Modern triage in the emergency department[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2010, 107(50): 892-898.
6
Farrohknia N, Castrén M, Ehrenberg A, et al. Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence[J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2011, 19: 42.
7
Shelton R. The emergency severity index 5-level triage system[J]. Dimens Crit Care Nurs, 2009, 28(1): 9-12.
8
Herpich F, Rincon F. Management of acute ischemic stroke[J]. Crit Care Med, 2020, 48(11): 1654-1663.
9
Boateng S, Sanborn T. Acute myocardial infarction[J]. Dis Mon, 2013, 59(3): 83-96.
10
Gibbs J, McCord J. Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: risk scores and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin[J]. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2020, 22(7): 49.
11
国家心血管病中心. 中国心血管健康与疾病报告2020[M] . 北京: 科学出版社, 2021: 15-16.
12
Jahan R, Saver JL, Schwamm LH, et al. Association between time to treatment with endovascular reperfusion therapy and outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated in clinical practice[J]. JAMA, 2019, 322(3): 252-263.
13
Terkelsen CJ, Sørensen JT, Maeng M, et al. System delay and mortality among patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. JAMA, 2010, 304(7): 763-771.
14
Parenti N, Reggiani ML, Iannone P, et al. A systematic review on the validity and reliability of an emergency department triage scale, the Manchester Triage System[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2014, 51(7): 1062-1069.
15
Azeredo TR, Guedes HM, Rebelo DAR, et al. Efficacy of the Manchester Triage System: a systematic review[J]. Int Emerg Nurs, 2015, 23(2): 47-52.
16
Storm-Versloot MN, Ubbink DT, Kappelhof J, et al. Comparison of an informally structured triage system, the emergency severity index, and the manchester triage system to distinguish patient priority in the emergency department[J]. Acad Emerg Med, 2011, 18(8): 822-829.
17
Storm-Versloot MN, Ubbink DT, Chin ACV, et al. Observer agreement of the Manchester Triage System and the Emergency Severity Index: a simulation study[J]. Emerg Med J, 2009, 26(8): 556-560.
18
Nishi FA, Polak C, Cruz D. Sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in risk prioritization of patients with acute myocardial infarction who present with chest pain[J]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2018, 17(7): 660-666.
19
Jiménez JG, Murray MJ, Beveridge R, et al. Implementation of the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) in the Principality of Andorra: Can triage parameters serve as emergency department quality indicators?[J]. CJEM, 2003, 5(5): 315-322.
20
Baumann MR, Strout TD. Triage of geriatric patients in the emergency department: validity and survival with the Emergency Severity Index[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2007, 49(2): 234-240.
21
Doherty SR, Hore CT, Curran SW. Inpatient mortality as related to triage category in three New South Wales regional base hospitals[J]. Emerg Med (Fremantle), 2003, 15(4): 334-340.
22
Raita Y, Goto T, Faridi MK, et al. Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models[J]. Crit Care, 2019, 23(1): 64.
23
Taleghani N, Taghipour F. Diagnosis of COVID-19 for controlling the pandemic: A review of the state-of-the-art[J]. Biosens Bioelectron, 2021, 174: 112830.
24
Kuriyama A, Urushidani S, Nakayama T. Five-level emergency triage systems: variation in assessment of validity[J]. Emerg Med J, 2017, 34(11): 703-710.
25
Cairós-Ventura LM, de Las MNM, Rodríguez-Gómez , et al. Validity and reliability of the emergency severity index in a spanish hospital[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019, 16(22): 4567.
26
Blomaard LC, Speksnijder C, Lucke JA, et al. Geriatric screening, triage urgency, and 30-day mortality in older emergency department patients[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2020, 68(8): 1755-1762.
27
Galvagno SJ, Massey M, Bouzat P, et al. Correlation between the revised trauma score and injury severity score: Implications for prehospital trauma triage[J]. Prehosp Emerg Care, 2019, 23(2): 263-270.
28
Maves RC, Downar J, Dichter JR, et al. Triage of scarce critical care resources in COVID-19 an implementation guide for regional allocation: an expert panel report of the task force for mass critical care and the american college of chest physicians[J]. Chest, 2020, 158(1): 212-225.
29
Judson TJ, Odisho AY, Neinstein AB, et al. Rapid design and implementation of an integrated patient self-triage and self-scheduling tool for COVID-19[J]. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2020, 27(6): 860-866.
30
Wu G, Yang P, Xie Y, et al. Development of a clinical decision support system for severity risk prediction and triage of COVID-19 patients at hospital admission: an international multicentre study[J]. Eur Respir J, 2020, 56(2): 2001104.
31
Reiss AB, De Leon J, Dapkins IP, et al. A telemedicine approach to COVID-19 assessment and triage[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2020, 56(9): 461.
32
Covino M, Sandroni C, Santoro M, et al. Predicting intensive care unit admission and death for COVID-19 patients in the emergency department using early warning scores[J]. Resuscitation, 2020, 156: 84-91.
[1] 周天平, 徐一宏, 徐卫东. 前交叉韧带重建相关研究的文献计量学分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 612-618.
[2] . 亚运智能EMSS的设计研发与运行实践[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 0-.
[3] 刘梦柔, 刘沛东, 张城铭, 刘阳, 李鹏翠, 杨自权. 基于文献计量学与可视化分析的骨组织工程支架材料的全球研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 411-420.
[4] 卢存存, 刘荣, 姚亮, 荀杨芹, 李美萱, 李慧娟, 胡立冬, 令娟, 郭天康, 杨克虎. 机器人手术的临床应用分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(04): 203-207.
[5] 徐峰, 陈小云, 张秦, 高谦. 全球肩袖康复十年研究热点和前沿分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 11-23.
[6] 陈文韬, 王宝军, 白晓冬, 高化, 刘振宇, 赵亮, 李亚东. 肱骨近端骨折外科手术治疗的文献计量学分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2019, 07(01): 63-69.
[7] 杨巧巧, 佟琰, 王宏, 谢大洋, 张玉婷, 张庆涛, 于茜, 赵小淋, 曹雪莹, 周建辉. 人工肾研究:文献计量学分析[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 241-247.
[8] 王鸿, 高俊宏, 卢青, 刘进仁, 范小琳, 李亮, 马宁, 王琪. 基于CiteSpace的创伤性脑损伤研究文献计量学分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 141-149.
[9] 廖想, 李爽, 曾瑶. 2012-2021年粪菌移植研究的趋势及热点分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 93-99.
[10] 何青华, 蚁锐娟, 邓碧丽, 杨康娣, 万贻丹, 史桂华, 陈荃敏, 张晶晶. 基于CiteSpace的经颈静脉肝内门体分流术文献计量学分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 330-335.
[11] 申鲁霞, 高英莉, 王妍, 时忠丽. 基于CiteSpace的国内外北美护理诊断分类系统领域的研究热点及趋势分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 274-279.
[12] 杨成会, 崔芬. 基于科学知识图谱的国际矮小症诊治研究热点及研究趋势分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 273-277.
[13] 戚厚兴, 杨成会, 崔芬, 马可骏, 孙大卫. 《中华诊断学电子杂志》2014至2017年基金资助论文计量分析[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2018, 06(03): 211-216.
[14] 高子昂, 段天骄, 谭玉勇, 刘德良, 段天英. 消化内镜隧道技术国内外研究现状及发展趋势的可视化分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 159-166.
[15] 林淼, 张绍元, 冯明祥, 谭黎杰, 丁建勇. 国内外胸腺瘤研究现状与趋势的文献可视化分析[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 213-223.
阅读次数
全文


摘要