Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04): 231-236. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2021.04.008

• Quality Control • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The retrospective study on SARS-CoV-2 screening test with low nucleic acid amplification signal

Juanping Yu1, Zhiqiang Li1, Long Li1, Qi Wei1, Weijie Du1, Zhen Bi1, Fangyun Li1, Qiong Fang1, Hao Chen1, Liangjun Chen1, Weiling Kang1, Zhihui Wang1, Weiwen Cai1, Meimei Yin1, Ting Fang1, Qianqian Wang1, Shengxue Mei1, Qiang Li1, Zhongbao Chang1, Menglai Shen1, Yating Cheng2, Xiaohua Li1,()   

  1. 1. Hefei KingMed Diagnostics, Hefei Anhui 230088, China
    2. Guangzhou KingMed Diagnostics, Guangzhou Guangdong 510005, China
  • Received:2020-11-23 Online:2021-11-28 Published:2022-01-04
  • Contact: Xiaohua Li

Abstract:

Objective

To improve the performance of nucleic acid amplification assay (RT-PCR)and obtain high quality screening results of SARS-CoV-2 detection through retrospective study of the data generated from confirmatory test.

Methods

RT-PCR kit A from our laboratory and the kit B provided by Bozhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were both utilized to analyze fifty throat swabs specimen in a double blind experimental manner. In the follow-up routine detection with reagent A, 1 354 of the 37 250 samples were found to have abnormal test results, among which 1 286 were failed test amplification samples, and 68 were abnormal test results of suspicious samples with end jump but no complete amplification. 1 354 samples were reexamined with reagent A, and the results of the two tests were statistically analyzed.

Results

The coincidence rate of 50 samples with known results was 96.0% (48/50), indicating the reliability of reagent A. The results of 1 286 throat swabs specimen with failed amplification retested with the same A kits showed that there are 1 114 specimen of negative results, 15 specimens of abnormal ORF 1ab gene signal, 10 specimen of abnormal N gene signal, and 147 specimens were remained failure of detection with no data. The re-tested result from 57 specimens with abnormal single gene signal at the first test by using kit A showed high consistence with 94.70% coincidence rate and with 10.53% (6/57) positive rate. The re-tested results from analyzing 11 specimens with double abnormal genes signal at the first test by kit A also showed complete consistence results (100% coincidence rate) with 81.82% positive rate (9/11).

Conclusions

The Kit A meets laboratory requirements for rapid early screening of viruses. Meanwhile,the specimen with any abnormal detective signal during the RT-PCR reaction should be retested to ensure reliable results. At the same time, the precise operating in laboratory with a high quality of specimen are the most important criteria for obtaining the high quality data.

Key words: Coronaviridae, Real-time polymerase chain reaction, Quality control

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-81341720 Fax: 020-37103505 E-mail: clinlab@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd