Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02): 141-148. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2026.02.008

• Original Article • Previous Articles    

Practice of a risk management framework for biochemical testing based on ISO 15189 and biosafety

Weijuan Liu1, Xinglun Qi2, Jing Ma2, Dagan Yang2,()   

  1. 1 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Linfen People's Hospital, Linfen Shanxi 041000, China
    2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310003, China
  • Received:2025-09-26 Online:2026-05-28 Published:2026-05-28
  • Contact: Dagan Yang

Abstract:

Objective

To explore a risk management framework based on ISO 15189 and biosafety to enhance risk management capabilities in biochemical testing.

Methods

According to CLSI QMS03 requirements, a risk management practice framework was constructed, including standardized online theoretical training, nonconformity management practices based on ISO 15189 and WS/T 442, and digital intelligence-based practices following the ISO 22367 risk management process. In 2025, 42 trainees were enrolled to validate the training effectiveness of this framework by assessing their mastery level (5-point scale) and theoretical assessment results (100-point scale), while evaluating risk management practices and risk priority numbers (RPN) in biochemical testing.

Results

Trainees achieved a mastery level of 4.50±0.27 for risk management practices, and theoretical assessment scores significantly increased from 61±15 to 91±11 after training (P<0.001). Established A general laboratory risk source database containing 122 items was established and 30 potential risk points specific to biochemical testing were identified, including 27 low-risk, 2 medium-risk, and 1 high-risk point. For the three medium- and high- risk points, quality control monitoring throughout the process (RPN 48), handling of infectious specimens (RPN 24), and delayed critical value reporting (RPN 24), corresponding risk control measures were implemented, reducing the risks to acceptable levels, and these were incorporated into the risk monitoring list.

Conclusion

An effective risk management framework has been established, integrating theoretical learning, contextualized practice, and risk assessment tools, thereby enhancing risk management capabilities and practical proficiency.

Key words: risk management, biochemical testing, biosafety, risk assessment, ISO 15189

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-81341720 Fax: 020-37103505 E-mail: clinlab@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd