切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (01) : 62 -66. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2014.01.013

实验室管理

石家庄市区30家医院单盲检测全血细胞计数结果的可比性分析
李志荣1, 强翠欣1, 杨靖1, 刘晓雷1, 韩卫2, 常樱2, 赵建宏1,()   
  1. 1.050000 石家庄, 河北医科大学第二医院 河北省临床检验中心
    2.河北省血液中心
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-08 出版日期:2014-02-28
  • 通信作者: 赵建宏

Survey of the comparability of complete blood count among 30 hospitals in Shijiazhuang

Zhirong Li1, Cuixin Qiang1, Jing Yang1, Xiaolei Liu1, Wei Han1, Ying Chang1, Jianhong Zhao1,()   

  1. 1.Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Provincial Center for Clinical Laboratories, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Received:2013-08-08 Published:2014-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Jianhong Zhao
引用本文:

李志荣, 强翠欣, 杨靖, 刘晓雷, 韩卫, 常樱, 赵建宏. 石家庄市区30家医院单盲检测全血细胞计数结果的可比性分析[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2014, 02(01): 62-66.

Zhirong Li, Cuixin Qiang, Jing Yang, Xiaolei Liu, Wei Han, Ying Chang, Jianhong Zhao. Survey of the comparability of complete blood count among 30 hospitals in Shijiazhuang[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2014, 02(01): 62-66.

目的

分析探讨石家庄市区30家医院门诊实验室全血细胞计数检测(compete blood count,CBC)结果的可比性,为河北省实施临床检验结果互认提供可行方法。

方法

采用CBC单盲检测调查研究设计。2013年4月9日,由河北省临床检验中心(以下简称“中心”)采集1名健康人新鲜晨血62 ml,用乙二胺四乙酸抗凝,并分装为31管,每管2 ml。采血后3 h内,将其中1份标本送至卫生部临床检验中心,用血细胞分析校准系统将该新鲜血定值后,作为调查标本真值(可溯源至血细胞分析参考方法)。其他30份标本分别送至石家庄市区30家医院(三级医院11家、二级医院15家及未分级医院4家)门诊检验科,3 h内检测后带回检测结果。然后,选择白细胞计数(white cell count, WBC)、红细胞计数(red cell count, RBC)、血红蛋白(hemoglobin, Hb)、红细胞比容(hematocrit, HCT)、血小板计数(platelet, PLT)5项指标,计算30家医院实验室单盲检测CBC结果与真值的偏差,采用成组t检验评价分析三级医院与二级医院CBC检测结果间的可比性。同时,调查分析各实验室使用仪器和室间质量评价(external quality assessment,EQA)信息,探讨CBC检测不合格的原因。

结果

按美国临床实验室改进法案(clinical laboratory improvement amendments,CLIA)规定的可接受生物变异范围,分析30家医院5项CBC检测项目结果,不合格医院分别为RBC 2家[6.7%(2/30)]、Hb 3家[10.0% (3/30)]、HCT 8家[26.7%(8/30)]。11家三级医院5项CBC指标的参数范围为WBC(5.0~5.6)×109/L、RBC(5.3~5.6)×1012/L、Hb(156.7~169.1)g/L、HCT(46.1~52.1)%、PLT(238.0~286.0)×109/L,15家二级医院CBC检测结果的参数范围为WBC(4.5~5.6)×109/L、RBC(5.0~5.9)×1012/L、Hb(150.0~171.0) g/L、HCT 42.0%~52.0%、PLT(215.0~296.0) ×109/L,两者间差异均无统计学意义(t值分别为1.44、0.01、0.91、1.93、0.20,P均>0.05)。各实验室检测CBC的仪器,使用Sysmex公司仪器进行检测的实验室最多[占57%(17/30)],其他分别为迈瑞公司血球仪23%(7/30)、法国ABX公司血球仪10%(3/30)、Beckman Coulter公司7%(2/30)和Thermo Fisher Scientific公司3%(1/30)。不合格实验室所用仪器种类无集中趋势,推测导致实验室不合格原因可能不是其检测系统的差别。调查30家医院CBC项目2012年EQA成绩仅2家不合格,与本调查结果不合格单位分布也不一致。

结论

石家庄市内二、三级医院间CBC检测结果具有很好的一致性。单盲调查有助于进一步发现临床实验室实际存在的一些问题,对了解本地区实行实验室间检验结果互认有积极作用。

Objective

To investigate the comparability of compete blood count (CBC) among 30 hospitals in Shijiazhuang in order to provide a reference for mutual recognition of test reports for outpatient laboratories from different hospitals.

Methods

Single-blind survey was designed for this research. Firstly, 62 ml fresh morning blood sample using ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid as anticoagulant was collected from a healthy person and packed to 31 tubes. One of those was measured by the calibration laboratory of hematology analysis in Chinese National Center for Clinical Laboratories as real result which could be traceable to reference method. The outpatient laboratories in 30 hospitals (including 11 tertiary hospitals and 15 secondary hospitals and 4 other unranked hospitals) were investigated using the other 30 samples. Five parameters of CBC were taken to evaluate the results including white cell count (WBC), red cell count (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit(HCT) and platelet (PLT). Results of 11 tertiary hospitals and 15 secondary hospitals were evaluated by group t test statistical analysis. Deviation between the real result and single-blinded results from 30 outpatient laboratories were analyzed to evaluate the comparability of CBC in different hospital. Information of test equipment and external quality assessment (EQA) was collected.

Results

There were 2 [(6.7%(2/30)] hospitals unqualified in RBC, 3 [10%(3/30)] hospitals in Hb and 8 [26.7%(8/30)] hospitals in HCT according to the acceptable range of biological variation provided by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA’88). The results of CBC between tertiary hospitals [parameter range: WBC (5.0-5.6)×109/L, RBC (5.3-5.6)×1012/L, Hb (156.7-169.1) g/L, HCT (46.1-52.1)%, PLT (238.0-286.0)×109/L] and secondary hospital [parameter range: WBC(4.5-5.6)×109/L, RBC (5.0-5.9)×1012/L, Hb (150.0- 171.0)g/L, HCT 42.0%-52.0%, PLT (215.0-296.0)×109/L]were analyzed using Student' s t test with the 0.05 confidence level accepted as significant and proved to be not statistically significant (t=1.44, 0.01, 0.91, 1.93, 0.20, respectivily, P>0.05). According to the survey of test instruments, Sysmex blood analyser was most popular machine in these laboratories, accounting for 57% (17/30).Others were Mindray blood analyzer accounting for 23% (7/30), ABX blood cell counter 10% (3/30), Beckman Coulter Company 7% (2/30) and Thermo Fisher Scientific Company 3% (1/30). No central tendency of laboratory instruments was found in the survey, inferring that the reasons of unqualified laboratories were not the difference of detection systems. Investigation of CBC EQA in 2012 showed there were only 2 laboratories failed among these 30 hospitals. The survey results was not consistent with this investigation.

Conclusions

Through this investigation,good consistency of CBC test in different levels of hospitals in Shijiazhuang city is revealed. Single-blind test is conducive to discover the actual situation in the clinical laboratories, which could be helpful to perform mutual recognition among test results from different clinical laboratories in local district positively.

表1 11家三级医院与15家二级医院检测结果比较
表2 30家医院对新鲜定值标本的CBC 5项检测结果
表3 各实验室检测仪器分布情况
1
中国人民共和国卫生部. 医疗质量控制中心管理办法(试行). 卫医政发〔2009〕51号. 2009-05-31.
2
黄建玲, 梁瑞莲, 周远青, 等. 新鲜全血在血液分析仪比对试验中的价值[J].检验医学, 2010, 25(9): 731-733.
3
彭明婷, 岳育红 , 申子瑜, 等. 北京市三级医院全血细胞计数结果可比性和准确性调查[J].中华检验医学杂志, 2007, 30(9): 987-991.
4
彭明婷, 谷小林, 陆红, 等.我国血细胞分析参考系统的建立[J].中华检验医学杂志, 2006, 29(3): 196-198.
5
Fraser CG. Biological Variation: From principles to practice. American Washington DC: Association Clinical Chemistry, 2001:137.
6
NCCL. NCCL S Ep9-A2 Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples: Approved guideline-second edition. NCCL, 1995.
7
吴卫, 崔巍, 李薇, 等.血小板聚集体计数在真性和假性板减少鉴别中的应用[J].中华检验医学杂志, 2009, 32(5): 557-561.
8
张蕾, 李晶华, 李智, 等. Sysmex XE-2100全自动血液分析仪对低值血小板检测应用探讨[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2010, 33(5): 457-459.
9
曾素根, 江虹, 黄玉霞, 等. 血液分析仪新鲜全血比对方案的建立及应用[J]. 检验医学, 2009, 24(2): 127-130.
10
宋颖, 王青, 李泳, 等. 上海市2010年部分基层医院血液检验质量分析[J].检验医学, 2012, 27(10): 840-843.
11
张克惠. 武汉地区临床血细胞分析仪检测结果的调查分析[J]. 华中医学杂志, 2007, 31(5): 398, 401.
[1] 高玲, 于哲, 范然, 臧银善. 外周血细胞计数比值评估类风湿关节炎疗效的价值[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 642-647.
[2] 王文娟, 单志明, 武锦彪, 吕俊霞, 王星, 郦卫星, 陈瑜. 杭州地区29家医疗机构全血细胞计数准确度和一致性调查[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2018, 06(03): 165-167.
[3] 王家健, 章雷, 陶然, 杨万丰, 雷秀明, 夏宇跃, 马骥, 张威, 余银辉, 李舒贝, 刘洪芳, 苏文芳, 陈建波, 任健康, 孙爱宝, 汪垚. 从化检验专科医联体在分级诊疗中的作用初探[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2017, 05(03): 141-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?