切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (03) : 144 -147. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2014.03.003

综述

产前分子诊断研究进展
郑昭璟1, 傅启华1,()   
  1. 1.200127 上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心检验科
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-30 出版日期:2014-08-28
  • 通信作者: 傅启华
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(81371893)

Prenatal molecular diagnosis: an update

Zhaojing Zheng1, Qihua Fu1,()   

  1. 1.Department of Laboratory Medicine,Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200127, China
  • Received:2014-04-30 Published:2014-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Qihua Fu
引用本文:

郑昭璟, 傅启华. 产前分子诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2014, 02(03): 144-147.

Zhaojing Zheng, Qihua Fu. Prenatal molecular diagnosis: an update[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2014, 02(03): 144-147.

产前诊断是预防出生缺陷、提高人口质量的重要技术手段。产前分子诊断能有效提高产前诊断的准确率和特异性。荧光原位杂交技术、荧光定量PCR技术、多重连接依赖探针扩增技术等已广泛应用于产前分子诊断的临床实践工作中。近几年来,染色体芯片分析和下一代测序技术正快速进入产前分子诊断领域,并有望成为产前分子诊断中的一线诊断试验。将高通量基因组分析技术与传统分子诊断技术进行有机整合并应用于产前分子诊断,将积极推动产前诊断的快速发展。

Prenatal diagnosis plays key roles in prevention of birth defects and enhancement of population quality. Prenatal molecular diagnosis can significantly improve the detection sensitivity and specificity of genetic and congenital abnormalities in fetus from all risk groups of pregnancy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization, quantitative fluorescent PCR, and multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification are routinely applied in prenatal molecular diagnosis. In recent years, chromosomal microarray analysis and next generation sequencing are remodeling the landscape of prenatal diagnosis, and have the potential to be the first-tier prenatal testing in near future. Integrating high through-put genomic assays into prenatal molecular diagnosis will promote the healthy development of prenatal diagnosis.

1
中华人民共和国卫生部. 中国出生缺陷防治报告(2012). 2012.
2
Liehr T, Weise A, Hamid AB, et al. Multicolor FISH methods in current clinical diagnostics[J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2013,13(3):251-255.
3
Hills A, Donaghue C, Waters J, et al. QF-PCR as a stand-alone test for prenatal samples: the first 2 years' experience in the London region[J].Prenat Diagn, 2010, 30(6): 509-517.
4
Holgado E, Liddle S, Ballard T, et al. Incidence of placental mosaicism leading to discrepant results between QF-PCR and karyotyping in 22,825 chorionic villus samples[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2011, 31(11): 1029-1038.
5
Mann K, Ogilvie CM. QF-PCR: application, overview and review of the literature[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012, 32(4): 309-314.
6
Boormans EM, Birnie E, Oepkes D, et al. Comparison of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 115(2 Pt 1): 297-303.
7
Chitty LS, Kistler J, Akolekar R, et al. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA): a reliable alternative for fetal chromosome analysis?[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2012, 25(8): 1383-1386.
8
Kjaergaard S, Sundberg K, Jørgensen F, et al. Diagnostic yield by supplementing prenatal metaphase karyotyping with MLPA for microdeletion syndromes and subtelomere imbalances[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2010, 30(10): 995-999.
9
Konialis C, Hagnefelt B, Sevastidou S, et al. Uncovering recurrent microdeletion syndromes and subtelomeric deletions/duplications through non-selective application of a MLPA-based extended prenatal panel in routine prenatal diagnosis[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2011, 31(6): 571-577.
10
Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus Statement:Chromosomal Microarray Is a First-Tier Clinical Diagnostic Test for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities or Congenital Anomalies[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2010, 86(5): 749-764.
11
Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher AJ, et al. Experience with microarraybased comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012, 32(10): 976-985.
12
Srebniak MI, Boter M, Oudesluijs GO, et al. Genomic SNP array as a gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of foetal ultrasound abnormalities[J]. Mol Cytogenet, 2012, 5(1): 14-17.
13
Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(23):2175-2184.
14
Reddy UM, Page GP, Saade GR, et al. Karyotype versus microarray testing for genetic abnormalities after stillbirth[J]. N Engl J Med,2012, 367(23): 2185-2193.
15
傅启华, 郑昭璟. 基于染色体芯片分析的产前诊断[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2013, 36(1): 6-10.
16
Wapner RJ, Driscoll DA, Simpson JL. Integration of microarray technology into prenatal diagnosis: counselling issues generated during the NICHD clinical trial[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012, 32(4): 396-400.
17
郑昭璟, 傅启华. 下一代测序技术在单基因遗传性疾病分子诊断中的应用[J]. 诊断学理论与实践, 2013, 12(4): 390-395.
18
Greene MF, Phimister EG. Screening for trisomies in circulating DNA[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370(9): 874-875.
19
Morain S, Greene MF, Mello MM. A New Era in Noninvasive Prenatal Testing[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(6): 499-501.
20
Bianchi DW, Parker RL, Wentworth J, et al. DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014,370(9): 799-808.
21
Bianchi DW, Wilkins-Haug L. Integration of noninvasive DNA testing for aneuploidy into prenatal care: what has happened since the rubber met the road?[J]. Clin Chem, 2014, 60(1): 78-87.
22
You Y, Sun Y, Li X, et al. Integration of targeted sequencing and NIPT into clinical practice in a Chinese family with maple syrup urine disease[J]. Genet Med, 2014, 16(8): 594-600.
23
Meng M, Li X, Ge H, et al. Noninvasive prenatal testing for autosomal recessive conditions by maternal plasma sequencing in a case of congenital deafness[J]. Genet Med, 2014, Epub ahead of print.
24
New MI, Tong YK, Yuen T, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of congenital adrenal hyperplasia using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014, 99(6): E1022-E1030.
25
Lam KWG, Jiang P, Liao GJ, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic diseases by targeted massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma: application to β-thalassemia[J]. Clin Chem, 2012,58(10): 1467-1475.
26
Kitzman JO, Snyder MW, Ventura M, et al. Noninvasive whole-genome sequencing of a human fetus[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2012, 4(137): 137ra76.
27
Lo YD. Noninvasive fetal whole-genome sequencing from maternal plasma: feasibility studies and future directions[J]. Clin Chem, 2013,59(4): 601-603.
28
Fan HC, Gu W, Wang J, et al. Non-invasive prenatal measurement of the fetal genome[J]. Nature, 2012, 487(7407): 320-324.
29
Talkowski ME, Ordulu Z, Pillalamarri V, et al. Clinical diagnosis by whole-genome sequencing of a prenatal sample[J]. N Engl J Med,2012, 367(23): 2226-2232.
30
傅启华, 郑昭璟. 新生儿遗传代谢性疾病的实验室筛查与诊断[J].中华检验医学杂志, 2014, 37(4): 1-4.
31
陈文祥. 我国临床检验外部质量控制概况[J/CD]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2013, 1(1): 9-12.
32
杨正华. 加强医学实验室技术能力做好实验室认可[J/CD]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2013, 1(1): 13-16.
[1] 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨, 陈玲, 戴晨燕. Miller-Dieker综合征胎儿产前超声、磁共振影像学特征及遗传学分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 281-287.
[2] 王德辉, 邓学东. 胎儿室间隔完整型肺动脉闭锁的超声心动图评估及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1266-1270.
[3] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[4] 戢秀勤, 杨小红, 赵胜, 路小军, 张晓燕, 张涛, 黄晓宇. 早孕期双胎反向动脉灌注序列征的产前超声诊断[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1355-1360.
[5] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 丁妍, 罗丹丹, 廖伊梅, 梁美玲, 秦越, 彭桂艳, 林毅, 邹于, 李胜利. 二维横切面新方法对胎儿胼胝体结构异常的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 899-907.
[6] 任芸芸. 无创产前诊断时代早孕期超声检查的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 873-876.
[7] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[8] 薛超, 张烨, 赵映, 韩建成, 谷孝艳, 孙琳, 刘晓伟, 宋伟, 何怡华. 胎儿先天性肺动脉瓣缺如综合征的超声特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 410-418.
[9] 张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕. 北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[10] 曾照敏, 余海燕. 超雌综合征的临床认知[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 145-150.
[11] 胡青, 余海燕. 胎儿宫内治疗及风险评估[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 23-30.
[12] 崔玉峰, 林毅军, 王志民. 幽门螺杆菌分子检测技术研究进展[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 257-262.
[13] 王楚风, 蒋安. 原发性肝癌的分子诊断[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 499-503.
[14] 刘湘, 张胜威, 陈琳, 姚群峰, 宁美微. 结合新型冠状病毒感染疫情时事提升分子诊断学课程教学效果的探索[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 175-180.
[15] 谌燕, 冯宗辉, 姜淑敏, 李敏, 易凤梅, 谭颖. 结节性硬化症一家系的TSC2基因变异分析和产前诊断[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 112-115.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?