切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (03) : 180 -183. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.20151.03.009

所属专题: 总编推荐 文献

实验研究

血清黑色素瘤细胞黏附分子在诊断肝细胞肝癌中的临床价值
汤珣, 王佳谊, 孙奋勇   
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-13 出版日期:2015-08-28
  • 通信作者: 孙奋勇

Clinical diagnosis value of human melanoma cell adhesion molecule in hepatocellular carcinoma

Xun Tang, Jiayi Wang, Fenyong Sun   

  • Received:2015-05-13 Published:2015-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Fenyong Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Fenyong, Email:
引用本文:

汤珣, 王佳谊, 孙奋勇. 血清黑色素瘤细胞黏附分子在诊断肝细胞肝癌中的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2015, 03(03): 180-183.

Xun Tang, Jiayi Wang, Fenyong Sun. Clinical diagnosis value of human melanoma cell adhesion molecule in hepatocellular carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2015, 03(03): 180-183.

目的

评价与探讨血清人黑色素瘤细胞黏附分子(melanoma cell adhesion molecule, MCAM)在肝细胞肝癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)中的表达及其诊断HCC的价值。

方法

采用酶联免疫吸附试验(enzyme-linked immunosorben assay, ELISA)检测2013年11月至2015年2月在上海市第十人民医院和瑞金医院住院的83例HCC患者和85名健康人血清MCAM、白细胞分化抗原(cluster of differentiation, CD)166水平,并用Spearman分析MCAM与丙氨酸氨基转移酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(aspartate aminotransferase,AST)、碱性磷酸酶(alkaline phosphatase,ALP)、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(γ-glutamyl transpeptidase,γ-GT)、胆汁酸(total bile acid,TBA)、总蛋白(total protein, TP)、甲胎蛋白(alpha fetal protein,AFP)诊断HCC的相关性;同时,通过受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线评价MCAM诊断HCC的特异度和敏感度。

结果

血清MCAM、CD166、AFP在健康对照组分别为(2 776.8±25.8)ng/L、(222.6±74.9) ng/L、(21.7±9.6) μg/L,在HCC组分别为(20 453.3±110.2) ng/L、(5 702.0±99.0) ng/L、(275.7±83.4) μg/L。两组的MCAM与CD166或MCAM与AFP均相关(r值分别为0.875、0.858,P均<0.001)。HCC组中γ-GT、TBA、ALP、ALT、AST、TP分别为(120.8±10.0)IU/L、(123.6±24.8)μmol/L、(158.2±15.4)IU/L、(69.3±8.3)IU/L、(135.7±12.8)IU/L、(67.3±8.7) μg/L。经Spearman分析,血清MCAM升高与CD166升高和肝功能降低(ALT、AST、ALP、γ-GT、TBA)均呈正相关(r值分别为0.875、0.407、0.831、0.456、0.670、0.685,P均<0.001)。以血清MCAM的ROC曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)0.940,确定其最佳临界值为2 397.6 μg/L时,诊断HCC的敏感度为90.4%(152/168例),特异度94.1%(158/168例);血清MCAM、CD166和AFP联合检测HCC的ROC曲线的AUC为0.984(95%CI 0.969~1.000)、敏感度为98.8%(160/168例)、特异度为94.1%(158/168例)。AFP、MCAM单项检测和MCAM联合CD166检测的ROC曲线的AUC、敏感度和特异度分别为0.931(95%CI 0.887~0.974)、89.2%(150/168例)、94.1%(158/168例), 0.940(95%CI 0.900~0.981)、90.4%(152/168例)、94.1%(158/168例),0.976(95%CI 0.955~0.998)、97.6%(164/168例)、92.9%(156/168例)。

结论

血清MCAM诊断HCC具有高敏感度和特异度,有能可成为诊断HCC的新指标,但需扩大样本量进行严格验证。AFP、MCAM单项检测和MCAM联合CD166检测都对辅助诊断HCC有临床应用价值。

Objective

To explore the expression characteristic of serum melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), evaluate the clinical significance of candidate MCAM in thediagnosis of HCC.

Methods

Eighty-three HCC patients and eighty-five healthy individuals at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital and Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital from November 2013 to February 2015 were considered eligible for this study. Serum MCAM and cluster of differentiation (CD)166 were examined using enzyme-linked immunosorben assay(ELISA). Analysis the relationship between MCAM and those seven indexes including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT), total bileacid (TBA), total protein (TP) and alpha fetal protein (AFP) by using spearman. Meanwhile, to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of MCAM in the diagnosisof HCC through the receiver-operating characteristics curve.

Results

Serum MCAM, serum CD166, AFP of healthy individuals were (2 776.7±25.8) ng/L, (222.6±74.9) ng/L, (21.7±9.6) μg/L and those of patients with HCC were (20 453.3±110.2) ng/L, (5 702.0±99.0) ng/L, (275.7±83.4) μg/L. A positivecorrelation was found between serum MCAM and CD166(r=0.875, P<0.001). Besides, a positivecorrelation was also found between serum MCAM and AFP(r=0.858, P<0.001). In patients with HCC, the data of γ-GT, TBA, ALP, ALT, AST and TP were collected as follows: (120.8±10.0) IU/L, (123.6±24.8) μmol/L, (158.2±15.4) IU/L, (69.3±8.3) IU/L, (135.7±12.8) IU/L, (67.3±8.7) μg/L. Serum MCAM was also positively correlated with CD166, ALT, AST, ALP, γ-GT TBA(r of 0875, 0.407, 0.831, 0.456, 0.670, 0.685, P<0.001). The areaunder the receiver operating characteristic curve for serum-MCAM was 0.940, for the differentiation of HCC patients from healthy individualswith a cut-off of 2 397.6 μg/L, sensitivity 90.4% (152/168), specificity 94.1%(158/168). AUC-ROC also indicated that the combination of MCAM and CD166 with AFP(0.984, 95%CI 0.969-1.000), sensitivity 98.8% (160/168), specificity 94.1% (158/168) to diagnose HCC was only slightly better than AFP (0.931, 95%CI 0.887-0.974), sensitivity 89.2% (150/168), specificity 94.1% (158/168) or MCAM (0.940(95% CI 0.900-0.981), sensitivity 90.4% (152/168), specificity 94.1% (158/168) alone or the combination of MCAM and CD166 (0.976, 95% CI 0.955-0.998), sensitivity 97.6% (164/168), specificity 92.9% (156/168).

Conclusions

Serum MCAM is a novel diagnostic tumor marker for HCC. With high sensitivity and specificity, MCAM could have a good diagnostic efficiency as a novel hepatocellular carcinoma tumor marker in the near future. But this still need to expand the sample size to further verification. The single examination of AFP, MCAM or the combination of MCAM with CD166 are all hetpful for diagnosis of HCC in clinical application.

表1 两组血清MCAM、CD166、AFP水平比较(±s
图1 血清MCAM、AFP单项或联合CD166诊断HCC的ROC曲线图
[1]
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55(2):74–108.
[2]
Overholtzer M, Zhang J, Smolen GA, et al. Transforming properties of YAP, a candidate oncogene on the chromosome 11q22 amplicon[J]. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 2006, 103(33):12405–12410.
[3]
Wang JY, Ma LF, Weng WH, et al. Mutual interaction between YAP and CREB promotes tumorigenesis in liver cancer[J]. Hepatology, 2013, 58(3):1011–1020.
[4]
Xu MZ, Yao TJ, Lee NP, et al. Yes-associated protein Is an independent prognostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 2009, 115(19):4576–4585.
[5]
Wang JY, Wang HM, Zhang Y, et al. Mutual inhibition between YAP and SRSF1 maintains long non-coding RNA, malat1-induced tumourigenesis in liver cancer[J]. Cell Signal, 2014, 26(5):1048–1059.
[6]
Wang J, Park JS, Wei Y, et al. TRIB2 Acts downstream of Wnt/TCF in liver cancer cells to regulate YAP and C/EBP alpha function[J]. Mol Cell, 2013, 51(2):211–225.
[7]
Ma L, Lin J, Qiao Y, et al. Serum CD166: a novel hepatocellular carcinoma tumor marker[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2015, 441:156–162.
[8]
Wang J, Tang X, Weng W, et al. The membrane protein melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM) is a novel tumor marker that stimulates tumorigenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Oncogene, 2015, 128(6):774–779.
[9]
Wang ZQ, Yan X. CD146, a multi-functional molecule beyond adhesion[J]. Cancer Lett, 2013, 330(2):150–162.
[10]
Tschaharganeh DF, Chen X, Latzko P, et al. Yes-associated protein up-regulates jagged-1 and activates the NOTCH pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2013, 144(7):1530–1542.
[11]
Raoul JL, Bruix J, Greten TF, et al. Relationship between baseline hepatic status and outcome, and effect of sorafenib on liver function: SHARP trial subanalyses[J]. J Hepatol, 2012, 56(5):1080–1088.
[12]
Sander LE, Sackett SD, Dierssen U, et al. Hepatic acute-phase proteins control innate immune responses during infection by promoting myeloid-derived suppressor cell function[J]. J Exp Med, 2010, 207(7):1453–1464.
[1] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[2] 高金红, 陈玉梅, 郭韵. 基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导在腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 517-520.
[3] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[4] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[5] 胡宁宁, 赵延荣, 王栋, 王胜亮, 郭源. FMNL3与肝细胞癌肝移植受者预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 283-288.
[6] 谢汶歆, 马乐, 刘晔, 曹晓明, 张万春. 前列腺特异性膜抗原PET/CT在肾癌诊疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 514-519.
[7] 王飞, 陈政, 余德才, 曹亚娟. 原发性肝癌合并门静脉高压症的微创手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 306-310.
[8] 张敏, 朱建华, 缪雅芳, 郭锦荣. 菝葜皂苷元对肝癌HepG2细胞抑制作用的机制研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 328-335.
[9] 曾聿理, 雷发容, 肖慧, 邱德亮, 谢静, 吴寻. 氯普鲁卡因通过调控circRNA-ZKSCAN1表达抑制肝癌Huh-7细胞体外生长和转移的研究[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 220-228.
[10] 袁雨涵, 杨盛力. 体液和组织蛋白质组学分析在肝癌早期分子诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 883-888.
[11] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[12] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[13] 广东省护士协会介入护士分会, 广东省医师协会介入医师分会. 原发性肝癌低血糖患者护理规范管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 709-714.
[14] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[15] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
阅读次数
全文


摘要