切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (03) : 180 -183. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.20151.03.009

所属专题: 总编推荐 文献

实验研究

血清黑色素瘤细胞黏附分子在诊断肝细胞肝癌中的临床价值
汤珣, 王佳谊, 孙奋勇   
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-13 出版日期:2015-08-28
  • 通信作者: 孙奋勇

Clinical diagnosis value of human melanoma cell adhesion molecule in hepatocellular carcinoma

Xun Tang, Jiayi Wang, Fenyong Sun   

  • Received:2015-05-13 Published:2015-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Fenyong Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Fenyong, Email:
引用本文:

汤珣, 王佳谊, 孙奋勇. 血清黑色素瘤细胞黏附分子在诊断肝细胞肝癌中的临床价值[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2015, 03(03): 180-183.

Xun Tang, Jiayi Wang, Fenyong Sun. Clinical diagnosis value of human melanoma cell adhesion molecule in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2015, 03(03): 180-183.

目的

评价与探讨血清人黑色素瘤细胞黏附分子(melanoma cell adhesion molecule, MCAM)在肝细胞肝癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)中的表达及其诊断HCC的价值。

方法

采用酶联免疫吸附试验(enzyme-linked immunosorben assay, ELISA)检测2013年11月至2015年2月在上海市第十人民医院和瑞金医院住院的83例HCC患者和85名健康人血清MCAM、白细胞分化抗原(cluster of differentiation, CD)166水平,并用Spearman分析MCAM与丙氨酸氨基转移酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(aspartate aminotransferase,AST)、碱性磷酸酶(alkaline phosphatase,ALP)、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(γ-glutamyl transpeptidase,γ-GT)、胆汁酸(total bile acid,TBA)、总蛋白(total protein, TP)、甲胎蛋白(alpha fetal protein,AFP)诊断HCC的相关性;同时,通过受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)曲线评价MCAM诊断HCC的特异度和敏感度。

结果

血清MCAM、CD166、AFP在健康对照组分别为(2 776.8±25.8)ng/L、(222.6±74.9) ng/L、(21.7±9.6) μg/L,在HCC组分别为(20 453.3±110.2) ng/L、(5 702.0±99.0) ng/L、(275.7±83.4) μg/L。两组的MCAM与CD166或MCAM与AFP均相关(r值分别为0.875、0.858,P均<0.001)。HCC组中γ-GT、TBA、ALP、ALT、AST、TP分别为(120.8±10.0)IU/L、(123.6±24.8)μmol/L、(158.2±15.4)IU/L、(69.3±8.3)IU/L、(135.7±12.8)IU/L、(67.3±8.7) μg/L。经Spearman分析,血清MCAM升高与CD166升高和肝功能降低(ALT、AST、ALP、γ-GT、TBA)均呈正相关(r值分别为0.875、0.407、0.831、0.456、0.670、0.685,P均<0.001)。以血清MCAM的ROC曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)0.940,确定其最佳临界值为2 397.6 μg/L时,诊断HCC的敏感度为90.4%(152/168例),特异度94.1%(158/168例);血清MCAM、CD166和AFP联合检测HCC的ROC曲线的AUC为0.984(95%CI 0.969~1.000)、敏感度为98.8%(160/168例)、特异度为94.1%(158/168例)。AFP、MCAM单项检测和MCAM联合CD166检测的ROC曲线的AUC、敏感度和特异度分别为0.931(95%CI 0.887~0.974)、89.2%(150/168例)、94.1%(158/168例), 0.940(95%CI 0.900~0.981)、90.4%(152/168例)、94.1%(158/168例),0.976(95%CI 0.955~0.998)、97.6%(164/168例)、92.9%(156/168例)。

结论

血清MCAM诊断HCC具有高敏感度和特异度,有能可成为诊断HCC的新指标,但需扩大样本量进行严格验证。AFP、MCAM单项检测和MCAM联合CD166检测都对辅助诊断HCC有临床应用价值。

Objective

To explore the expression characteristic of serum melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), evaluate the clinical significance of candidate MCAM in thediagnosis of HCC.

Methods

Eighty-three HCC patients and eighty-five healthy individuals at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital and Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital from November 2013 to February 2015 were considered eligible for this study. Serum MCAM and cluster of differentiation (CD)166 were examined using enzyme-linked immunosorben assay(ELISA). Analysis the relationship between MCAM and those seven indexes including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT), total bileacid (TBA), total protein (TP) and alpha fetal protein (AFP) by using spearman. Meanwhile, to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of MCAM in the diagnosisof HCC through the receiver-operating characteristics curve.

Results

Serum MCAM, serum CD166, AFP of healthy individuals were (2 776.7±25.8) ng/L, (222.6±74.9) ng/L, (21.7±9.6) μg/L and those of patients with HCC were (20 453.3±110.2) ng/L, (5 702.0±99.0) ng/L, (275.7±83.4) μg/L. A positivecorrelation was found between serum MCAM and CD166(r=0.875, P<0.001). Besides, a positivecorrelation was also found between serum MCAM and AFP(r=0.858, P<0.001). In patients with HCC, the data of γ-GT, TBA, ALP, ALT, AST and TP were collected as follows: (120.8±10.0) IU/L, (123.6±24.8) μmol/L, (158.2±15.4) IU/L, (69.3±8.3) IU/L, (135.7±12.8) IU/L, (67.3±8.7) μg/L. Serum MCAM was also positively correlated with CD166, ALT, AST, ALP, γ-GT TBA(r of 0875, 0.407, 0.831, 0.456, 0.670, 0.685, P<0.001). The areaunder the receiver operating characteristic curve for serum-MCAM was 0.940, for the differentiation of HCC patients from healthy individualswith a cut-off of 2 397.6 μg/L, sensitivity 90.4% (152/168), specificity 94.1%(158/168). AUC-ROC also indicated that the combination of MCAM and CD166 with AFP(0.984, 95%CI 0.969-1.000), sensitivity 98.8% (160/168), specificity 94.1% (158/168) to diagnose HCC was only slightly better than AFP (0.931, 95%CI 0.887-0.974), sensitivity 89.2% (150/168), specificity 94.1% (158/168) or MCAM (0.940(95% CI 0.900-0.981), sensitivity 90.4% (152/168), specificity 94.1% (158/168) alone or the combination of MCAM and CD166 (0.976, 95% CI 0.955-0.998), sensitivity 97.6% (164/168), specificity 92.9% (156/168).

Conclusions

Serum MCAM is a novel diagnostic tumor marker for HCC. With high sensitivity and specificity, MCAM could have a good diagnostic efficiency as a novel hepatocellular carcinoma tumor marker in the near future. But this still need to expand the sample size to further verification. The single examination of AFP, MCAM or the combination of MCAM with CD166 are all hetpful for diagnosis of HCC in clinical application.

表1 两组血清MCAM、CD166、AFP水平比较(±s
图1 血清MCAM、AFP单项或联合CD166诊断HCC的ROC曲线图
[1]
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55(2):74–108.
[2]
Overholtzer M, Zhang J, Smolen GA, et al. Transforming properties of YAP, a candidate oncogene on the chromosome 11q22 amplicon[J]. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 2006, 103(33):12405–12410.
[3]
Wang JY, Ma LF, Weng WH, et al. Mutual interaction between YAP and CREB promotes tumorigenesis in liver cancer[J]. Hepatology, 2013, 58(3):1011–1020.
[4]
Xu MZ, Yao TJ, Lee NP, et al. Yes-associated protein Is an independent prognostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 2009, 115(19):4576–4585.
[5]
Wang JY, Wang HM, Zhang Y, et al. Mutual inhibition between YAP and SRSF1 maintains long non-coding RNA, malat1-induced tumourigenesis in liver cancer[J]. Cell Signal, 2014, 26(5):1048–1059.
[6]
Wang J, Park JS, Wei Y, et al. TRIB2 Acts downstream of Wnt/TCF in liver cancer cells to regulate YAP and C/EBP alpha function[J]. Mol Cell, 2013, 51(2):211–225.
[7]
Ma L, Lin J, Qiao Y, et al. Serum CD166: a novel hepatocellular carcinoma tumor marker[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2015, 441:156–162.
[8]
Wang J, Tang X, Weng W, et al. The membrane protein melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM) is a novel tumor marker that stimulates tumorigenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Oncogene, 2015, 128(6):774–779.
[9]
Wang ZQ, Yan X. CD146, a multi-functional molecule beyond adhesion[J]. Cancer Lett, 2013, 330(2):150–162.
[10]
Tschaharganeh DF, Chen X, Latzko P, et al. Yes-associated protein up-regulates jagged-1 and activates the NOTCH pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2013, 144(7):1530–1542.
[11]
Raoul JL, Bruix J, Greten TF, et al. Relationship between baseline hepatic status and outcome, and effect of sorafenib on liver function: SHARP trial subanalyses[J]. J Hepatol, 2012, 56(5):1080–1088.
[12]
Sander LE, Sackett SD, Dierssen U, et al. Hepatic acute-phase proteins control innate immune responses during infection by promoting myeloid-derived suppressor cell function[J]. J Exp Med, 2010, 207(7):1453–1464.
[1] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[2] 高金红, 陈玉梅, 郭韵. 基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导在腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 517-520.
[3] 林巧, 周丽. RFA联合LAH术治疗原发性肝癌并门静脉癌栓的临床效果分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 521-524.
[4] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[5] 马立伟, 贾志强, 陈午盛, 邵明亮, 刘琼, 段玉松. CalliSpheres载药微球联合碘化油治疗肝癌的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-372.
[6] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[7] 谢汶歆, 马乐, 刘晔, 曹晓明, 张万春. 前列腺特异性膜抗原PET/CT在肾癌诊疗中的应用价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 514-519.
[8] 谭智勇, 付什, 李宁, 王海峰, 王剑松. 膀胱小细胞癌发病机制及其诊疗研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 183-187.
[9] 张琳, 吴波, 王东文. 前列腺癌特异性近红外荧光探针的研究进展与展望[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 6-11.
[10] 曾聿理, 雷发容, 肖慧, 邱德亮, 谢静, 吴寻. 氯普鲁卡因通过调控circRNA-ZKSCAN1表达抑制肝癌Huh-7细胞体外生长和转移的研究[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 220-228.
[11] 刘杜先, 张杰东, 付鲁渝, 熊志强, 龚程, 张小雅, 高明悦, 孟俊宏, 刘兰侠. 沉默circXPO1抑制肝癌细胞恶性生物学行为[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 159-166.
[12] 鲍乐, 刘颖, 王友彬, 陈龙, 朱玉芝, 梁爽, 权鹤太, 李鹏飞. 还阳通络灸在原发性肝癌介入治疗中的临床应用研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 197-202.
[13] 万菲, 任勇军. 原发性肝细胞癌肿瘤标志物研究进展[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 77-81.
[14] 叶禾清, 李杰, 张玉元, 胡炉淇, 吴白露, 李鑫, 叶书文, 李一帆, 高玥, 詹鹏超, 吕培杰, 李臻. 载药微球化疗栓塞联合多纳非尼及PD-1治疗中晚期大肝癌的疗效分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 212-216.
[15] 曹耿飞, 任伟新, 张海潇, 顾俊鹏, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木. 小粒径载药微球联合信迪利单抗及贝伐珠单抗治疗不可切除肝癌的安全性及疗效分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 45-50.
阅读次数
全文


摘要