切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (04) : 229 -233. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2018.04.009

所属专题: 文献

质量控制

基于风险管理的统计质量控制策略研究进展
曾玉萍1, 黄亨建1,()   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西医院实验医学科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-02 出版日期:2018-11-28
  • 通信作者: 黄亨建

Advances of statistical quality control plan based on risk management

Yuping Zeng1, Hengjian Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2018-08-02 Published:2018-11-28
  • Corresponding author: Hengjian Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Hengjian, Email:
引用本文:

曾玉萍, 黄亨建. 基于风险管理的统计质量控制策略研究进展[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2018, 06(04): 229-233.

Yuping Zeng, Hengjian Huang. Advances of statistical quality control plan based on risk management[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(04): 229-233.

实验医学旨为临床提供可靠的实验室检测结果,从而支持医疗决策和改善患者健康状况。为达到这个目的,实验室质量管理策略经历了不断的变化和进展。传统统计质量控制以误差检出率判断质控方案性能,六西格玛质量管理策略引进了西格玛度量作为过程指数,EP23-A提出了基于风险管理的质量控制计划,以及近年来为不断优化风险管理策略而提出了列线图和风险管理指数等图形工具和方法。本文总结以上质量管理工具,为实验室提供基于风险管理的统计质量控制策略及评价。

Laboratory medicine aims to provide reliable laboratory test results in support of medical decision-making and to improve patient health. To achieve this goal, laboratory quality management strategies have undergone constant changes and progresses. Performance of quality control plans was judged by probability of error detection in traditional statistical quality control. Sigma metrics were introduced as a process index in six sigma quality management strategy. Then quality control plan based on risk management was proposed in EP23-A. And recently, to continuously optimize risk management strategies, graphic tools and methods such as nomogram and risk management index were proposed. This paper summarized the above quality management tools to provide statistical quality control strategies based on risk management and evaluations for laboratory.

图1 基于风险管理的QCP
图2 联合SQC与列线图设计QCP
表1 患者伤害的可接受概率
图3 患者伤害的预期概率
[1]
Westgard JO,Westgard SA. Quality control review: Implementing a scientifically based quality control system[J]. Ann Clin Biochem, 2016,53(Pt 1):32-50.
[2]
Jassam N. Quality control in the age of risk management[J]. Ann Clin Biochem, 2014,51(2):719-720.
[3]
CLSI. EP23-A Laboratory quality control based on risk management[S]. Wayne (PA):Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2011.
[4]
CLSI. C24-Ed4 Statistical quality control for quantitative measurement procedures: principles and definitions. 4th ed.[S]. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2016.
[5]
NCCLS. C24-A Internal quality control testing: principles and definitions[S]. Wayne (PA): National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 1991.
[6]
Parvin CA. Planning statistical quality control to minimize patient risk: It′s about time[J]. Clin Chem, 2018,64(2):249-250.
[7]
Parvin CA. What′s new in laboratory statistical quality control guidance: The 4th edition of CLSI C24, statistical quality control for quantitative measurement procedures: principles and definitions[J]. J Appl Lab Med, 2017,1:581-584.
[8]
Coskun A. Six Sigma and calculated laboratory tests[J]. Clin Chem, 2006,52(4):770-771.
[9]
Alexander M. Six sigma: The breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the world′s top corporations by Mikel Harry; Richard Schroeder[J]. Technometrics, 2001,43(3):370-370.
[10]
Westgard JO,Westgard SA. The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance[J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2006,125(3):343-354.
[11]
Westgard JO,Westgard SA. Six sigma quality management system and design of risk-based statistical quality control[J]. Clin Lab Med, 2017,37(1):85-96.
[12]
Bayat H. QC-dependent risk reduction:clinical chemistry journal club comments[DB/OL]. Published on the Westgard.QC website; accessible at: Accessed July 2015).

URL    
[13]
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14971 Medical devices-application of risk management to medical devices[S]. Geneva (Switzerland):ISO,2007.
[14]
Westgard JO. Perspectives on quality control, risk management, and analytical quality management[J]. Clin Lab Med, 2013,33(1):1-14.
[15]
Person NB. Developing risk-based quality control plans: an overview of CLSI EP23-A[J]. Clin Lab Med, 2013,33(1):15-26.
[16]
Jairaman J,Sakiman Z,Li LS. Sunway medical laboratory quality control plans based on six sigma, risk management and uncertainty[J]. Clin Lab Med, 2017,37(1):163-176.
[17]
Yago M. Selecting statistical quality control procedures for limiting the impact of increases in analytical random error on patient safety[J].Clin Chem, 2017,63(5):1022-1030.
[18]
Yago M,Alcover S. Selecting statistical procedures for quality control planning based on risk management[J]. Clin Chem, 2016,62(7):959-965.
[19]
Bayat H. Selecting multi-rule quality control procedures based on patient risk[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2017,55(11):1702-1708.
[20]
Westgard JO,Bayat H,Westgard SA. Planning risk-based SQC schedules for bracketed operation of continuous production analyzers[J]. Clin Chem, 2018,64(2):289-296.
[21]
Parvin CA,Baumann NA. Assessing quality control strategies for HbA1c measurements from a patient risk perspective[J]. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2018,12(4):786-791.
[1] 孙帼, 谢迎东, 徐超丽, 杨斌. 超声联合临床特征的列线图模型预测甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 734-742.
[2] 王思思, 金晶, 汪婕. 初产妇哺乳期乳腺炎发生的影响因素及风险模型构建[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 272-276.
[3] 刘丹丹, 宋鸣, 李霞, 徐夏君. 老年髋部骨折术后便秘的影响因素及其列线图预测模型[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 607-612.
[4] 张秋彬, 张楠, 林清婷, 徐军, 朱华栋, 姜辉. 急性胰腺炎合并急性肾损伤患者的预后评估[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 382-389.
[5] 郑鹏, 吴赛萍, 谢秀璋, 史庆丰. 术前预测感染性肾结石列线图模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 299-306.
[6] 杨梅, 周春, 赵艾红, 王琴. 儿童难治性肺炎支原体肺炎所致塑型性支气管炎风险列线图模型的构建[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 274-281.
[7] 王迎迎, 谢平. 乙型肝炎病毒感染合并肺结核患者发生肝损伤的危险因素及预测模型构建[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 267-273.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[10] 王万川, 麦广智, 张晓槟, 冯家豪. 腹腔镜下LAR术治疗低位直肠癌保肛术中钉仓数量与术后LARS的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 491-496.
[11] 徐慧新, 刘波, 唐立钧. 体外冲击波治疗>1 cm输尿管上段结石失败的预测模型建立[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 506-511.
[12] 张磊磊, 蒋方, 徐疾飞, 周真文, 郭志文, 毕满华. 乳头状肾细胞癌预后预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 343-350.
[13] 王立涛, 刘恩瑞, 李振鲁, 吴昌亮, 高鹏. 基于SEER数据库手术后原发性阑尾肿瘤患者预后列线图构建与验证[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 404-414.
[14] 李兆, 张颖, 宋彦呈, 李兆鹏, 刘曙光, 郭栋, 陈栋, 李宇. 构建预测结直肠癌肝转移术后患者生存的列线图模型[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 311-318.
[15] 杨静, 顾红叶, 赵莹莹, 孙梦霞, 查园园, 王琪. 老年血液透析患者短期死亡的影响因素及列线图预测模型的预测作用[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 254-259.
阅读次数
全文


摘要