切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 26 -30. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2019.01.007

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

实验研究

反向点杂交法测定浙江省4620例男性HPV感染者的流行病学特征
冯莉亚1, 刘军权1,(), 陈莹莹1   
  1. 1. 310053,杭州金域医学检验所
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-23 出版日期:2019-02-28
  • 通信作者: 刘军权

Reverse dot hybridization analysis of epidemiological characteristics of 4620 HPV infected men in Zhejiang Province

Liya Feng1, Junquan Liu1,(), Yingying Chen1   

  1. 1. Hangzhou Kingmed Medical Laboratory Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310053, China
  • Received:2018-01-23 Published:2019-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Junquan Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Junquan; Email:
引用本文:

冯莉亚, 刘军权, 陈莹莹. 反向点杂交法测定浙江省4620例男性HPV感染者的流行病学特征[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2019, 07(01): 26-30.

Liya Feng, Junquan Liu, Yingying Chen. Reverse dot hybridization analysis of epidemiological characteristics of 4620 HPV infected men in Zhejiang Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(01): 26-30.

目的

调查浙江省男性人乳头瘤病毒(human papilloma virus,HPV)感染的亚型分布及流行病学特点,为男性HPV感染早期筛查、预防、诊断提供依据。

方法

回顾性汇总分析2014年1月至2016年12月期间,浙江省17~74岁的4620名男性尖锐湿疣皮损拭子或组织标本;4620例样本中,其中120份因细胞量不足判定采样失败,剩余4500例样本按不同年龄分为6组(17~20岁组268名、21~30岁组1958名、31~40岁组1156名、41~50岁组667名、51~60岁组355名、>60岁组96名)。用聚合酶链反应(polymerase chain reaction, PCR)和反向点杂交法测定23种HPV基因型,并分析其HPV阳性率分布、HPV阳性率差异和高低危型HPV感染特征。

结果

4500例样本中有2799例HPV阳性,总阳性率为62.2%,其中:以6型和11型阳性率最高,分别为15.58%(436/2799例)和10.00%(280/2799例)。高危型阳性率最高的为52型,占4.72% (132/2799例)。在2799例HPV DNA阳性者中,有1266例为单一感染;混合感染1533例,占44.26%,单纯低危型最高为三重感染,单纯高危型最高为四重感染,而高低危混合感染达七重,其中七重感染占2.25%(63/2799例)。高低危混合感染数高于单纯高危型和单纯低危型,两者比较有统计学差异(χ2分别为28.1、82.8,P均<0.05)。HPV阳性结果以21~40岁青壮年为主,占总人数的69.2% (3114/4500)。而HPV阳性率以17~20岁组(75.0%)和51~60岁组(79.7%)最高,与其他年龄段[21~30岁(60.7%)、31~40岁(59.1%)、41~50岁(59.6%)和>60岁(46.4%)组]相比χ2分别为20.48、22.51、18.86、26.02和46.03、48.89、40.99、41.84,P均<0.05。

结论

浙江地区男性HPV感染者主要以6、11型为主,高发于青壮年,HPV混合感染比例较高,高低危混合感染较常见。

Objective

To investigate the subtype distributions and epidemiological characteristics of human papilloma virus (HPV) infection in Zhejiang Province and to provide evidence for early screening, prevention and diagnosis of male HPV infection.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 4620 male swabs or tissue specimens of genital warts from 17 to 74 years old in Zhejiang Province during January 2014 to December 2016 was performed. Of the 4620 samples, 120 samples were out of the study because of insufficient cell volume, the remaining 4500 samples were divided into 6 groups according to the ages (268 in the 17 to 20-year-old group, 1958 in the 21 to 30-year-old group, 1156 in the 31 to 40-year-old group, 667 in the 41 to 50-year-old group, 355 in the 51 to 60-year-old group and 96 in the 60-year-old group). Twenty-three HPV genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse dot hybridization, then we analyzed the HPV positive rate distribution, HPV positive rate difference and high and low risk HPV infection characteristics.

Results

Of the 4500 samples, 2799 were positive for HPV with positive rate was 62.2%. Among them, type 6 and 11 HPV is the most prevalent, which account for 15.58% (436/2799) and 10.00% (280/2799) respectively. The most prevalent high-risk HPV type was type 52, accounting for 4.72% (132/2799). Of the 2799 HPV DNA-positive individuals, 1266 were single infections. Mixed infections occurred in 1533 cases, accounting for 44.26%. The highest single low-risk type was triple infection, the highest single high-risk type was quadruple infection, while the high-risk mixed infection reached seven, of which seven infections accounted for 2.25% (63/2799 cases).. The number of high-risk mixed infections was higher than that of high-risk and low-risk. Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (χ2=28.1, and 82.8, respectively, P<0.05). HPV positive results were mainly found in young adults aged 21 to 40, accounting for 69.2% (3114/4500). The HPV positive rate was highest in the 17 to 20-year-old group (75.0%) and the 51 to 60-year-old group (79.7%). Compared with other age groups [21 to 30 years old (60.7%), 31 to 40 years old (59.1%), 41 In the 50-year-old (59.6%) and the >60-year-old (46.4%) groups, the χ2 were 20.48, 22.51, 18.86, 26.02, and 46.03, 48.89, 40.99, and 41.84, respectively, P<0.05.

Conclusion

The male HPV infections in Zhejiang Province are mainly type 6 and 11. The main types of male HPV infection in Zhejiang Province are type 6 and 11 and are more common in young and middle-aged people. The proportion of mixed HPV infection is high, and high and low risk mixed infection are more common.

表1 2799例男性感染者23个HPV亚型分布
表2 2799例男性HPV DNA感染类型和重数分布[例(%)]
表3 2799例阳性样本中不同年龄组HPV DNA感染阳性率比较
1
Garland SM, Brotherton JM, Condon JR, et al. Human papillomavirus prevalence among indigenous and non-indigennous Australian women prior to a national HPV vaccination program[J]. BMC Med, 2011,9:104-105.
2
金玉姬,岳丽杰,陶林,等. 男性人乳头瘤病毒检测方法的建立及临床应用[J]. 中华男科学杂志, 2008,14(2):106-109.
3
张永侠. HPV相关口咽鳞癌临床预后及肿瘤分子指标的研究[D]. 北京: 北京协和医学中国医学科学院, 2013.
4
Marriani L, Bonanni P, Castiglia P, et al. Prevention of HPV cancer related through HPV-9: State of the art, potentioal benefits and open issues[J]. Ig Sanita Pubbl, 2015,71(6):629-650.
5
Dupin N. Genital warts[J]. Clin Dermatol, 2004,22(6):481-486.
6
Husain RS, Ramakrishnan V. Global variation of human papillomavirus genotypes and selected genes involved in cervical malignancies[J]. Ann Glob Health, 2015,81(5):675-683.
7
满宝华,汪坚,黄艳梅. 1372例宫颈感染人乳头瘤病毒基因分型的探讨[J]. 分子诊断与治疗杂志, 2014,6(2):110-112.
8
Menzo S, Ciavattini A, Bagnarelli P, et al. Molecular epidemiology and pathogenic potential of underdiagnosed human papillomavirus types[J]. BMC Microbiol, 2008,8:112.
9
Partridge JM, Hughes JP, Feng Q, et al. Genital human papillomavirus infection in men: incidence and risk factors in a cohort of university students[J]. J Infect Dis, 2007,196(8):1128-1136.
10
Vaccarella S, Lazcano-Ponce E, Castro-Garduñno JA, et al. Prevalence and determinants of human papillomavirus infection in men attending vasectomy clinics in Mexico[J]. Int J Cancer, 2006,119(8):1934-1939.
11
Chan PK, Luk AC, Luk TN, et al. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in anogenital warts of men[J]. J Clin Virol, 2009,44(2):111-114.
12
薛耀华,江汉宁,郑和平,等. 广州地区尖锐湿疣患者人乳头状瘤病毒的基因分型[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2013,23(5):978-980.
13
田欣欣,王睿,姜玲波,等. 山东地区1225例男性尖锐湿疣患者HPV感染亚型分析[J]. 中国男科学杂志, 2016,30(7):41-45.
14
Potocnik M, Kocjan B, Seme K, et al. Distribution of human papillomavirus(HPV) genotypes in genital warts from males in Slovenia[J]. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat, 2007,16(3):91-96,98.
15
雷振春,郑一斐,汪英俊,等. 尖锐湿疣患者人乳头状瘤病毒的感染与基因分型研究[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2015,25(7):1475-1477.
16
赵强,刘喆,肖征,等. 尖锐湿疣患者人乳头状瘤病毒基因分型的分布[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2014,24(5):1052-1054.
17
杨娜,刘禄,赵琪林,等. 遂宁地区83例尖锐湿疣患者高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测及临床表现分析[J]. 临床医药实践, 2013,22(2):89.
18
Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, et al. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer[J]. Lancet, 2007,370(9590):890-907.
[1] 张旭, 徐建平, 苏冬明, 王彩芬, 王大力, 张文智. 男性乳腺肿块的超声造影特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 854-859.
[2] 阚艳敏, 王东, 丁建民, 经翔. 住院医师规范化培训教学活动指南在超声医学教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 537-541.
[3] 韩珊珊, 徐琰, 陈卿, 杨钰坪, 明佳, 周妮娅, 李雪, 刘科. 近日节律紊乱与乳腺癌的关系[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 102-106.
[4] 刘丽, 贾小慧, 刘艳, 沈晓佳, 周谦, 张海洋, 向丽佳, 温晓滨, 周元琳, 许婉婷, 杨磊, 李磊, 王林, 唐义蓉. 2017—2022年成都市儿童流行性感冒流行特征及儿童早期预警评分对病情严重程度的预测[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 235-241.
[5] 夏思燕, 纪世召, 周万芳, 黄润之, 张丽君. 对烧创伤患者出院准备度现状调查及影响因素的分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(04): 331-337.
[6] 黄明珠, 陆鹰, 何康, 王艳. 儿童肝移植受者出院后服药依从性现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 112-117.
[7] 郭新宇, 李林强, 杨广超, 张成鹏, 陆朝阳. 无张力疝修补术对男性生殖功能影响的研究进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 251-254.
[8] 陈冀, 邓才霞, 张厚丽, 祝冰晶, 刘攀, 何建, 唐春兰, 周向东, 罗虎. 高危肺结节患者认知及焦虑状况调查分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 164-168.
[9] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[10] 李秘, 邱华娟, 纪燕琴, 周明辉. P16、Ki67表达及病毒载量对宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅱ合并高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染患者病变转归的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 272-278.
[11] 李琼蔚, 苏怡, 卢喆, 李谦, 孙伟. 内蒙古赤峰地区高中生睡眠问题现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 117-124.
[12] 秦毓, 杨苗, 畅锴, 王舒宁. 山西省女性人乳头瘤病毒感染现状分析[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 105-108.
[13] 曹宾, 郭瑛, 夏盼盼, 刘佳榛, 王骏, 孙育民. 非阵发性心房颤动的治疗策略:来自心脏电生理一线医师的问卷调查[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 147-153.
[14] 秦建军, 郭旭峰, 胡杨, 李向楠, 李卓毅, 林江波, 梅新宇, 唐鹏, 王长春, 王枫, 王洪琰, 尹俊, 袁勇, 赵晋波, 李志刚, 李印. 日本2022版食管癌诊治指南在中国的接受度——中国红杉树专家调研[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 195-199.
[15] 韩菲, 张遥, 周立新, 倪俊, 朱以诚. 八年制医学生神经病学见习巡诊课程现状调查与改革探讨[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 260-265.
阅读次数
全文


摘要