切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 43 -47. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2019.01.011

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

自动化和信息化

全要素智能审核在临检各学科结果报告应用中的功效评估
张举1, 陶然2,(), 毛源1, 卞淑慧1, 曹鹏1   
  1. 1. 210042,南京金域医学检验中心
    2. 510005,广州金域医学检验中心;570311 海口,海南金域医学检验中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-11 出版日期:2019-02-28
  • 通信作者: 陶然
  • 基金资助:
    海南省重点研发项目(SQ2018SHFZ0233)

Effectiveness evaluation of the all-factor intelligent auditing applying to release reports in different clinical department

Ju Zhang1, Ran Tao2,(), Yuan Mao1, Shuhui Bian1, Peng Cao1   

  1. 1. Nanjing Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory, Nanjing 210042, China
    2. Guangzhou Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory, Guangzhou 510005, China; Hainan Kingmed Center for Clinical Laboratory, Haikou 570311, China
  • Received:2018-06-11 Published:2019-02-28
  • Corresponding author: Ran Tao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tao Ran, Email:
引用本文:

张举, 陶然, 毛源, 卞淑慧, 曹鹏. 全要素智能审核在临检各学科结果报告应用中的功效评估[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2019, 07(01): 43-47.

Ju Zhang, Ran Tao, Yuan Mao, Shuhui Bian, Peng Cao. Effectiveness evaluation of the all-factor intelligent auditing applying to release reports in different clinical department[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(01): 43-47.

目的

使用自主开发的金域实验室信息管理系统中的全要素智能审核平台,通过在生化发光、临床血液、临床免疫、质谱、微生物、基因及病理等临检学科分别设置项目的自动审核预警规则,将大量原本需要由人工审核发布的检验报告单交由计算机代为发布,从而减少人工差错引起的报告单结果错误,降低样本周转时间,节约人力成本,提高工作效率。

方法

根据生化发光、临床血液、临床免疫、临床微生物、基因及病理等临检学科的技术要求和行业标准,设定多条不同的预警规则对检测结果进行判断,判断通过即可由计算机将结果发布,判断不通过则将结果拦截转为人工审核发布。定期统计每个检测项目的自动审核通过情况,并逐步优化预警规则,比较自动审核功能使用前后的样本周转时间(turn around time, TAT)变化和报告单批准人员数量变化来评估自动审核功效。

结果

实验室各学科使用自动审核功能后,报告单发布的准确性和时效性均出现了明显的提高,平均TAT缩短0.5 h,合计人员减少4人,报告单缺陷率降低80%。

结论

我中心开发的全要素自动审核程序可以满足更多学科的结果报告自动审核需求,优于市场上大多数的自动审核中间件。使用自动审核功能不仅可以进一步提高实验室工作效率,缩短TAT,还能够减少人为因素引起的结果审核质量缺陷,维护实验室的分析质量保证。

Objective

Use the self-developed all-factor intelligent auditing platform in the KMClient laboratory information system to release a large number of inspection reports, the automatic auditing and early warning rules of items are set up in biochemical luminescence, clinical blood, clinical immunology, mass spectrometry, microorganism, gene and pathology and a large number of inspection reports originally required to be issued by manual auditing are submitted to the computer for publication, thus reduce the number of people and the error of the report result caused by manual error, reduce the sample turn around time (TAT), save labor costs and improve work efficiency.

Methods

According to the technical requirements and industry standards of biochemical luminescence, clinical blood, clinical immunology, clinical microbiology, gene and pathology, several autoverification rules are set up respectively to judge the results. The results can be released by computer if judgement is passed, otherwise the results will be intercepted and released by manual verification statistical regularly on the status of automatic audit approval of each test item, and gradually optimize the early warning rules, compare the TAT changes before and after the use of automatic audit function and the number changes of report approval personnel to evaluate the effectiveness of automatic audit.

Results

After the use of the automatic audit in all disciplines of the laboratory, the accuracy and timeliness of the report have been significantly improved. The average TAT in each department has been shortened by 0.5 h and the total number of staffs has been reduced by 4, and the defect rate of the report defect rate has been reduced by 80%.

Conclusion

The all-factor intelligent auditing platform developed by our center can meet the needs of many disciplines, and is superior to most of the automatic audit middleware in the market. The use of automatic audit can not only further improve the efficiency of laboratory work and shorten TAT, but also reduce the quality defects caused by human factors, and maintain the quality assurance of laboratory analysis.

表1 人机校验数据统计(例)
表2 临床生化室TAT时间比较
表3 各学科自动审核报告占比
图1 自动审核平台搭建示意图
1
Valdiguie PM, Rogari E, Philippe H. VALAB: Expert system for validation of biochemical data[J]. Clin Chem, 1992,38(1):83-87.
2
Oosterhuis WP, Ulenkate HM, Goldschmidt HM. Evaluation of LabRespond, a new automated validatiuon system for clinical laboratory test results[J]. Clin Chem, 2000,46(11):1811-1817.
3
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 15189:2012, Medical laboratories requirements for quality and competence[S].

URL    
4
College of American Pathologists. Laboratory general checklist laboratory computer services[Z].

URL    
5
Clinical and Laboratory Standars Institute. AUTO10-A Autoverification of clinical laboratory test results: approved guideline[S]. 2006.
6
夏良裕,程歆琦,刘茜,等. 临床实验室生化免疫项目自动审核程序的建立与应用[J].中华医学杂志, 2017,97(8):616-621.
7
冯强. 临床生化检验结果的自动审核[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2015,36(4):547-548.
8
杨大干,胡长爱,邢美园,等. 临床决策支持在检验结果自动审核和解释中的应用评价[J]. 中国数字医学, 2014,9(17):45-47.
9
何訸,余霆,罗通行. 大量历史数据在生化项目自动审核测试验证中的应用[J]. 中国数字医学, 2017,12(2):68-70.
10
雷和月,王红旗,郭远瑜,等. 免疫学检验结果自动审核程序的建立及其应用[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2015,33(5):388-390.
[1] 项伶俐, 廖雨琴, 祝宇翀, 刘军权. 尿液分析自动审核方法的建立与评价[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 59-63.
阅读次数
全文


摘要