切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 219 -222. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2019.04.007

所属专题: 文献

实验研究

PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP在原发性肝癌的诊断和疗效监测的临床应用
李冬玲1, 尹光凤1, 张淑琼1, 李晓非1,(), 李松鹏1, 余婷婷1   
  1. 1. 650041,昆明市第三人民医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-06 出版日期:2019-11-28
  • 通信作者: 李晓非

Clinical application of PIVKA-II and AFP in the diagnosis and curative effect monitoring of primary hepatocellular carcinoma

Dongling Li1, Guangfeng Ying1, Shuqiong Zhang1, Xiaofei Li1,(), Songpeng Li1, Tingting Yu1   

  1. 1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Third People′s Hospital of Kunming, Kunming 650041, China
  • Received:2018-08-06 Published:2019-11-28
  • Corresponding author: Xiaofei Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Xiaofei, Email:
引用本文:

李冬玲, 尹光凤, 张淑琼, 李晓非, 李松鹏, 余婷婷. PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP在原发性肝癌的诊断和疗效监测的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2019, 07(04): 219-222.

Dongling Li, Guangfeng Ying, Shuqiong Zhang, Xiaofei Li, Songpeng Li, Tingting Yu. Clinical application of PIVKA-II and AFP in the diagnosis and curative effect monitoring of primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(04): 219-222.

目的

探讨血清异常凝血酶原(protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-Ⅱ,PIVKA-Ⅱ)和甲胎蛋白(alpha fetoprotein,AFP)在原发性肝癌(primary hepatocellular carcinoma,PHC)中的诊断和疗效监测的临床应用。

方法

收集2015年11月至2017年11月期间昆明市第三人民医院572例血清,采用全自动免疫分析仪和全自动免疫分析仪分别检测血清标本PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP水平,分析两者单独及联合检测诊断PHC的受试者工作曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)、敏感度和特异性,比较PHC患者治疗前后血清水平的变化。

结果

PHC患者血清PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP水平均明显高于肝硬化组、慢性乙型肝炎组、肝内胆管细胞癌组和健康对照组。PIVKA-Ⅱ诊断是PHC的敏感度87.28%,高于AFP诊断PHC的敏感度70.52%。PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP联合检测诊断PHC的敏感度94.21%。采用PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP联合诊断方案,可提高诊断PHC的敏感性和特异性。PHC患者接受治疗后,PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP水平均显著降低,与治疗前比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

血清PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP对PHC的诊断和疗效监测均具有较高的临床应用价值,联合检测可进一步提高敏感度和特异性。

Objective

To explore the clinical application of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) in the diagnosis and curative effect monitoring of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (PHC).

Methods

The serum levels of PIVKA-II and AFP in 572 patients from The Third Peoples Hospital of Kunming from November 2015 to November 2017 were detected by automatic immunoanalyzer and automatic immunoanalyzer respectively. The area under the working curve (ROC-A) of the subjects diagnosed PHC by the two methods were analyzed separately and jointly. The sensitivity and specificity were also compared before and after treatment in patients with PHC.

Results

The serum levels of PIVKA-II and AFP in PHC patients were significantly higher than those in liver cirrhosis group, chronic hepatitis B group, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group and healthy controls. The sensitivity of PIVKA-II in the diagnosis of PHC was 87.28%, higher than that of AFP (70.52%). The sensitivity of both PIVKA-II and AFP in the diagnosis of PHC was 94.21%. Combination of PIVKA-II and AFP can improve the sensitivity and specificity of PHC diagnosis. After treatment, PIVKA-II and AFP levels in patients with PHC were significantly lower than those before treatment (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Serum PIVKA-II and AFP have high clinical value in the diagnosis and curative effect monitoring of PHC. Combined detection of these two markers can further improve the sensitivity and specificity.

表1 5组血清PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP水平比较[中位数(最小值~最大值)]
表2 血清PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP诊断HCC的ROC-AUC比较
表3 PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP单项及联合检测的曲线下面积比较
表4 血清PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP诊断PHC的敏感度和特异度比较
表5 血清PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP水平与肿瘤大小和TNM分期的关系[中位数(最小值~最大值)]
表6 PHC组患者治疗前后血清PIVKA-Ⅱ和AFP水平(均值)的比较
1
魏矿荣,彭侠彪,梁智恒,等. 全国肝癌流行概况[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2015,24(8):621-630.
2
金鑫,金生. 肝癌早期诊断相关分子标志物研究进展[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2015,31(23):3579-3582.
3
濮珏彪,王学峰,彭亦冰. 血清异常凝血酶原检测在原发性肝癌临床诊断中的应用[J]. 检验医学, 2014,29(3):270-273.
4
周晓华,司徒坚墉,陈艳玲. 原发性肝癌患者血清异常凝血酶原检测的意义[J]. 吉林医学, 2015,36(14):3036-3037.
5
李生,林英辉,潘元平,等. AFP、AFU和DCP联合检测对原发性肝癌的诊断意义[J]. 安徽医药, 2013,17(10):1720-1722.
6
Zinkin NT, Grall F, Bhaskar K et al. Serum proteomics and biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2008,14:470-477.
7
Murakami N, Tamano M, Yoneda M, et al. Desgamma carboxyprothrombin (DCP) ratio is a useful prognostic tumor marker for single nodule hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2008,55:197-201.
8
Okuda H, Nakanishi T, Takatsu K. Serum levels of des-Y-carboxy prothrombin measured using the revised enzyme immunoassay kit with increased sensitivity in relation to clinicopathologic features of solitary hepathocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 2000,88:544-549.
9
厉有名,范建高,王炳元,等. 酒精性肝病诊疗指南[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2011,27(6):801-804.
10
中华医学会肝病学分会脂肪肝和酒精肝病学组. 中国非酒精性脂肪性肝病诊疗指南(2010年修订版)[J/CD]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2012,4(7):4-10.
11
王贵强,王福生,成军,等. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2015年版)[J/CD]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2015,9(5):570-589.
12
陈红松,窦晓光,段钟平,等. 丙型肝炎防治指南(2015年更新版)[J]. 泸州医学院学报, 2016,39(2):95-113.
13
黎莉,杨卫文,魏涛,等. 乙型肝炎肝硬化并发原发性肝癌的危险因素Logistic分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2016,36(7):1653-1654.
14
李佳红,付娜,牛学敏,等. 573例原发性肝癌病因及临床特点分析[J]. 实用肝脏病学杂志, 2015,18(4):399-402.
15
叶胜龙. 原发性肝癌研究当前面临的挑战[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2015,31(6):819-823.
16
Lok AS, Sterling RK, Everhart JE, et al. Des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin and alpha-fetoprotein as biomarkers for the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2010,138:493-502.
17
Liebman HA, Furie BC, Tong MJ, et al. Des-γ-Carboxy (Abnormal) prothrombin as a serum marker of primary hepatocelluiar carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 1984,310:1427-1431.
[1] 孙德伟, 李锐, 杨丹, 唐春霖, 陈朝晖. 混合型肝癌临床特点及超声造影模式分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(06): 417-422.
[2] 徐婷婷, 詹泳池, 王晓东, 刘兴会. 电子胎心监测结果出现正弦波形的胎母输血综合征围生期结局分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 382-389.
[3] 孙静静, 郭霞, 饶艳琼, 代依灵, 田钰, 高举. 儿童肝母细胞瘤疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(04): 373-381.
[4] 朱晓童, 蒋敏. 母体血清学指标预测前置胎盘合并胎盘植入研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(04): 477-482.
[5] 兰青, 熊枝繁, 杨盛力. 甲胎蛋白在胃肝样腺癌中的作用机制及诊断预后研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 376-379.
[6] 王楚风, 蒋安. 原发性肝癌的分子诊断[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 499-503.
[7] 陈家豪, 邝小红, 廖媛, 刘志欢, 陈忠城, 周文营. 血清学多参数Logistic回归模型对肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(06): 615-618.
[8] 周三顺, 王祖森, 李满江, 朱呈瞻, 曺景玉, 吴力群. 血清CA125在低水平AFP肝细胞癌R0切除术后患者中的预后价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2019, 08(03): 256-259.
[9] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[10] 周庆, 杨旭. 甲胎蛋白、纤维蛋白原与前白蛋白比值、癌胚抗原、D-二聚体对结肠癌术后复发的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 301-305.
[11] 莫鹏, 郭杏春, 梁秀娟, 王耀明. 超声引导与CT引导射频消融治疗肝细胞癌患者疗效及预后比较[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 151-154.
[12] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[13] 王斌. 小儿实体肿瘤介入治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2019, 07(02): 168-171.
[14] 张立波, 任志忠, 刘影, 张跃伟. 部分脾栓塞术联合TACE治疗原发性肝癌伴脾功能亢进的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2018, 06(02): 133-136.
[15] 习浩, 刘荣静. 维生素K缺乏或拮抗剂-Ⅱ诱导蛋白对乙肝相关性肝癌诊断价值的探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2020, 08(04): 220-223.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?