切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (03) : 136 -139. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2014.03.001

观点

国外实验室自建项目管理带给我们的启示
刘维薇1,2, 郑特1, 徐科1, 关明3,()   
  1. 1.200072 同济大学附属上海市第十人民医院检验科
    2.200072 上海市皮肤病医院检验科
    3.200072 复旦大学附属华山医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-05 出版日期:2014-08-28
  • 通信作者: 关明
  • 基金资助:
    上海市卫生局优秀学科带头人计划资助项目(XBR2011044)上海市卫生局优秀青年人才培育计划(XYQ2013095)上海申康医院发展中心辅助科室能力建设项目(SHDC22014006)

Enlightenment from the management of laboratory developed test in foreign laboratory

Weiwei Liu1, Te Zheng1, Ke Xu1, Ming Guan2,()   

  1. 1.Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University,Shanghai 200072, China
    2.Department of Laboratory Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University,Shanghai 200040, China
  • Received:2014-08-05 Published:2014-08-28
  • Corresponding author: Ming Guan
引用本文:

刘维薇, 郑特, 徐科, 关明. 国外实验室自建项目管理带给我们的启示[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2014, 02(03): 136-139.

Weiwei Liu, Te Zheng, Ke Xu, Ming Guan. Enlightenment from the management of laboratory developed test in foreign laboratory[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2014, 02(03): 136-139.

实验室自建项目(laboratory developed tests,LDTs)在个体化诊断中发挥越来越重要的作用,同时也变得越来越复杂,风险很高,存在的问题和隐患亟待解决。国外,尤其是美国对LDTs的监管经历了几十年演变,逐步认识并强调监管的重要性,进一步规范各项监管措施。我国目前虽未允许LDTs在临床应用,但临床转化指日可待。理想的监管模式应该包括公正的、基于风险管理的监管方案、逐步监管、能力验证、临床有效性和实用性以及紧急使用授权规定等多个方面。LDTs是检验医学发展的一次机遇,应逐步建立并完善。

Laboratory developed tests (LDTs) are playing an increasingly important role in personalized medicine; however, it is also becoming more complex, high-risk, and full of problems and pitfalls to be solved. The regulation of LDTs have been captured much more attention in foreign countries, especially in the United State, after its decades of evolution, and newly rules are draw up. The clinical applications of LDTs are just around the corner in China,even though it is not qualified currently. An ideal model of regulation should include fairness, risk-based regulatory program, gradually supervision, proficiency testing, clinical effectiveness and practicality as well as Emergency Use Authorization. LDTs provide an opportunity not only for developing laboratory medicine but also for bettering the clinical service; while the quality control and management system of LDTs should be established and improved gradually.

1
Vance GH. College of American Pathologists proposal for the oversight of laboratory-developed tests. Arch Pathol Lab Med,2011,135(11):1432-1435.
2
Schwartz MK. Genetic testing and the clinical laboratory improvement amendments of 1988: present and future. Clin Chem, 1999,45(5):739-745.
3
Dequeker E, Ramsden S, Grody WW, et al. Quality control in molecular genetic testing. Nat Rev Genet, 2001,2(9):717-723.
4
Jennings L, Van Deerlin VM, ML Gulley. Recommended principles and practices for validating clinical molecular pathology tests. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2009,133(5):743-755.
5
Kaul K, Leonard DG, Gonzalez A, et al. Oversight of genetic testing:an update. J Mol Diagn, 2001,3(3):85-91.
6
McGovern MM, Benach MO, Wallenstein S, et al. Quality assurance in molecular genetic testing laboratories. JAMA, 1999,281(9):835-840.
7
Prence EM. A practical guide for the validation of genetic tests. Genet Test, 1999,3(2):201-205.
8
Guzel O, Guner EI. ISO 15189 accreditation: Requirements for quality and competence of medical laboratories, experience of a laboratory I.Clin Biochem, 2009,42 (4-5):274-278.
9
Yanikkaya-Demirel G. ISO 15189 accreditation: Requirements for quality and competence of medical laboratories, experience of a laboratory II. Clin Biochem, 2009,42 (4-5):279-283.
10
Berwouts S, Morris MA, Dequeker E. Approaches to quality management and accreditation in a genetic testing laboratory. Eur J Hum Genet, 2010,18 Suppl 1:S1-S19.
11
Ferreira-Gonzalez A, Emmadi R, Day SP, et al. Revisiting oversight and regulation of molecular-based laboratory-developed tests: a position statement of the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn, 2014,16(1):3-6.
12
Allen TC, Hammond ME, Robboy SJ. Quality and the college of american pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2011,135(11): 1441.
13
Louis DN, Virgin HW, Asa SL. "Next-generation" pathology and laboratory medicine. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2011,135(12): 1531-1532.
14
Weiss RL. The long and winding regulatory road for laboratorydeveloped tests. Am J Clin Pathol, 2012,138(1):20-26.
15
Joly Y, Koutrikas G, Tassé AM, et al. Regulatory approval for new pharmacogenomic tests: a comparative overview. Food Drug Law J,2011,66(1):1-24.
16
Allen TC. Quality: walk the walk. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2011,135(11):1384-1386.
17
Mattocks CJ, Morris MA, Matthijs G, et al. A standardized framework for the validation and verification of clinical molecular genetic tests.Eur J Hum Genet, 2010,18(12):1276-1288.
18
Halling KC, Schrijver I, Persons DL. Test verification and validation for molecular diagnostic assays. Arch Pathol Lab Med,2012,136(1):11-13.
[1] 姚庆春, 张立慧, 徐华, 顾安曼, 王玉萍, 孟玫, 任宏生, 张继承, 王春亭. 医院感染数据周反馈及专职医院感染监管对医院感染率的影响[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2018, 04(04): 323-328.
[2] 吴宗勇, 张晓煜, 万俊杰, 林一腾, 张丽, 齐军, 林勇平. 检验科对外送第三方医学检验实验室检测项目的质量监管[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 199-203.
[3] 毛源, 王玉琢, 高娟, 卞林翠, 袁征, 李志强, 张明亮. 第三方医学实验室精益管理实践探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 193-198.
[4] 孙瑜, 姜傥, 许励, 朱雪梅, 刘洪伟, 钱伟, 吴家辉, 李筠, 吴波, 邢娜, 梁尚华, 王妙天. 独立医学实验室细胞病理样本全程信息化管理探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2018, 06(04): 245-249.
[5] 许健, 邹阳, 孙建超, 何雅靓, 吴娴, 陶永德. 检验医学学科发展与人才培养探究[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2017, 05(03): 149-151.
[6] 齐雪然, 申子瑜, 连奕奕, 狄瑜秀. 分级诊疗制度下独立医学实验室的发展分析[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2016, 04(04): 197-200.
[7] 林娥, 梁耀铭, 周志锋, 范书源, 张雅兰. "互联网+"时代独立医学实验室的创新实践分析[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2016, 04(02): 78-81.
[8] 翟培军. 十年风雨十年情——回忆我国医学实验室认可之十年[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2014, 02(03): 193-197.
[9] 胡冬梅, 周亚莉, 李军燕, 翟培军. ISO 15189:2012技术要求变化要点解读[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2014, 02(03): 162-165.
[10] 刘维薇, 关明. 2013版《医学实验室质量和能力认可准则在基因扩增检验领域的应用说明》改版解读[J/OL]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2013, 01(01): 38-42.
阅读次数
全文


摘要