1 |
Bourbeau PP, Ledeboer NA. Automation in clinical microbiology[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2013, 51(6):1658-1665.
|
2 |
Struelens MJ, Denis O, Rodriguez-Villalobos H. Microbiology of nosocomial infections: progress and challenges[J]. Microbes Infect,2004,6(11):1043-1048.
|
3 |
Smismans A, Verhaegen J, Schuermans A, et al. Evaluation of the Copan ESwab transport system for the detection of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus: a laboratory and clinical study[J].Diag microbiol infect dis, 2009, 65(2):108-111.
|
4 |
Fontana C, Favaro M, Limongi D, et al. Comparison of the eSwab collection and transportation system to an amies gel transystem for Gram stain of clinical specimens[J]. BMC Res Notes, 2009, 2:244.
|
5 |
Matthews S, Deutekom J. The future of diagnostic bacteriology[J].Clin Microbiol Infect, 2011,17(5):651- 654.
|
6 |
Mulatero F, Bonnardel V, Micolaud C. The way forward for fast microbiology[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2011, 17(5):661-667.
|
7 |
Glasson JH, Guthrie LH, Nielsen DJ, et al. Evaluation of an automated instrument for inoculating and spreading samples onto agar plates[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2008,46(4):1281-1284.
|
8 |
Mischnik A, Mieth M, Busch CJ, et al. First evaluation of an automated specimen inoculation for wound swab specimens by use of the Previ Isola system compared to manual inoculation in a routine laboratory: finding a cost-effective and accurate approach[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2012,50(8):2732-2736.
|
9 |
Jones GA, Matthews R, Cunningham R, et al. Comparison of automated processing of flocked swabs with manual processing of fiber swabs for detection of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus[J].J Clin Microbiol, 2011,49(7):2717-2718.
|
10 |
Bourbeau P, Swartz BL. First evaluation of the WASP, a new automated microbiology plating instrument[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2009,47(4):1101-1106.
|
11 |
Greub G, Prod' hom G. Automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose? [J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2011,17(5):655-660.
|
12 |
Fenselau C, Demirev PA. Characterization of intact microorganisms by MALDI mass spectrometry [J]. Mass Spectrom Rev, 2001,20(4):157-171.
|
13 |
Emonet S, Shah HN, Cherkaoui A, et al. Application and use of various mass spectrometry methods in clinical microbiology [J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2010,16(11):1604-1613.
|
14 |
Cherkaoui A, Hibbs J, Emonet S, et al. Comparison of two matrixassisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry methods with conventional phenotypic identification for routine identification of bacteria to the species level [J]. J Clin Microbiol,2010,48(4):1169-1175.
|
15 |
Liu H, Du Z, Wang J, et al. Universal sample preparation method for characterization of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2007, 73(6):1899-1907.
|
16 |
Croxatto A, Prod' hom G, Greub G. Application of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in clinical diagnostic microbiology[J]. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2012,36(2):380-407.
|
17 |
Ferreira L, Sanchez-Juanes F, Munoz-Bellido JL, et al. Rapid method for direct identification of bacteria in urine and blood culture samples by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry: intact vs. extraction method[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect,2011, 17(7):1007-1012.
|
18 |
Ferreira L, Sanchez-Juanes F, Gonzalez-Avila M, et al. Direct identification of urinary tract pathogens from urine samples by matrixassisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry[J].J Clin Microbiol, 2010, 48(6): 2110-2115.
|
19 |
Junkins AD, Arbefeville SS, Howard WJ, et al. Comparison of BD Phoenix AP Workflow with Vitek 2[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2010,48(5):1929-1931.
|
20 |
Jekarl DW, Han SB, Kim YJ, et al. Evaluation of Vitek2 and BD Phoenix in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis,2010, 67(4): 384-386.
|
21 |
Jin WY, Jang SJ, Lee MJ, et al. Evaluation of VITEK 2, MicroScan,and Phoenix for identification of clinical isolates and reference strains[J]. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis, 2011, 70(4):442-447.
|