切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华临床实验室管理电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 80 -83. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5820.2018.02.004

所属专题: 文献

综述

临床分子病理检测质控品的研究进展
王雪亮1, 肖艳群1, 王华梁1,()   
  1. 1. 200126 上海市临床检验中心分子生物学室
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-08 出版日期:2018-05-28
  • 通信作者: 王华梁
  • 基金资助:
    上海第四轮公共卫生三年行动计划-卫生检验学项目(15GWZK0301)

Research progress in quality control materials used for clinical molecular pathological testing

Xueliang Wang1, Yanqun Xiao1, Hualiang Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Molecular Biology, Shanghai Center for Clinical Laboratory, Shanghai 200126, China
  • Received:2018-03-08 Published:2018-05-28
  • Corresponding author: Hualiang Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Hualiang, Email:
引用本文:

王雪亮, 肖艳群, 王华梁. 临床分子病理检测质控品的研究进展[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2018, 06(02): 80-83.

Xueliang Wang, Yanqun Xiao, Hualiang Wang. Research progress in quality control materials used for clinical molecular pathological testing[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Management(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(02): 80-83.

分子病理检测是肿瘤个体化治疗的重要依据,其检测结果的准确可靠与患者疗效紧密相关。为确保检测质量,须在检测中加入特定质控品对检测过程进行严格质量控制。本文对常用分子病理检测用质控品的类型及其优点和局限性阐述如下,以便为实验室选择相关质控品提供帮助,进而更好地为临床提供准确可靠的结果。

Molecular pathological testing is important to the individualized treatment of cancer, and the accuracy and reliability of the testing results is closely related to the patient curative effect. In order to ensure the quality of the testing, it is necessary to use specific quality control materials for strictly monitoring the testing process. This paper reviews the types, advantages and limitations of commonly used quality control materials for molecular pathological testing so as to provide help for the selection of related quality control products in the laboratory and to provide more accurate and reliable results for the clinic.

1
Ludwig JA, Weinstein JN. Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection [J]. Nat Rev Cancer, 2005,5(11):845-856.
2
Bellon E, Ligtenberg MJ, Tejpar S, et al. External quality assessment for KRAS testing is needed: setup of a European program and report of the first joined regional quality assessment rounds [J]. Oncologist, 2011,16(4):467-478.
3
Deans ZC, Bilbe N, O′Sullivan B, et al. Improvement in the quality of molecular analysis of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer detected by three rounds of external quality assessment [J]. J Clin Pathol, 2013, 66(4):319-325.
4
Emile JF, Tisserand J, Bergougnoux L, et al. Improvement of the quality of BRAF testing in melanomas with nationwide external quality assessment, for the BRAF EQA group [J]. BMC Cancer, 2013, 13:472.
5
Normanno N, Fenizia F, Castiglione F, et al. External quality assessment for EGFR mutations in Italy: improvements in performances over the time [J]. ESMO Open, 2017,2(2):e000160.
6
Normanno N, Pinto C, Castiglione F, et al. The Italian external quality assessment for RAS testing in colorectal carcinoma identifies methods-related inter-laboratory differences [J]. J Transl Med, 2015, 13:287.
7
Boleij A, Tops BB, Rombout PD, et al. RAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer: excellent reproducibility amongst 17 Dutch pathology centers [J]. Oncotarget, 2015,6(17):15681-15689.
8
Zhang R, Ding J, Han Y, et al. The reliable assurance of detecting somatic mutations in cancer-related genes by next-generation sequencing: the results of external quality assessment in China [J]. Oncotarget, 2016,7(36):58500-58515.
9
Zhang R, Peng R, Li Z, et al. Synthetic Circulating Cell-free DNA as Quality Control Materials for Somatic Mutation Detection in Liquid Biopsy for Cancer [J]. Clin Chem, 2017,63(9):1465-1475.
10
Xiao Y, Gao X, Maragh S, et al. Cell lines as candidate reference materials for quality control of ERBB2 amplification and expression assays in breast cancer [J]. Clin Chem, 2009,55(7):1307-1315.
11
Dijkstra JR, Opdam FJ, Boonyaratanakornkit J, et al. Implementation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell line pellets as high-quality process controls in quality assessment programs for KRAS mutation analysis [J]. J Mol Diagn, 2012,14(3):187-191.
12
Zhang R, Han Y, Huang J, et al. Results of first proficiency test for KRAS testing with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell lines in China [J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2014,52(12):1851-1857.
13
Patton S, Normanno N, Blackhall F, et al. Assessing standardization of molecular testing for non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a worldwide external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for EGFR mutation testing [J]. Br J Cancer, 2014,111(2):413-420.
14
Dumur CI, Almenara JA, Powers CN, et al. Quality control material for the detection of somatic mutations in fixed clinical specimens by next-generation sequencing [J]. Diagn Pathol, 2015,10:169.
15
Li Y, Zhang R, Han Y, et al. Comparison of the types of candidate reference samples for quality control of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status detection [J]. Diagn Pathol, 2016,11(1):85.
16
Li Y, Zhang R, Peng R, et al. Reliability Assurance of Detection of EML4-ALK Rearrangement in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Results of Proficiency Testing in China [J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2016, 11(6):924-929.
17
Jia S, Zhang R, Lin G, et al. A novel cell line generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology as universal quality control material for KRAS G12V mutation testing [J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2018 [Epub ahead of print]
18
Peng R, Zhang R, Lin G, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 Technology-Based Xenograft Tumors as Candidate Reference Materials for Multiple EML4-ALK Rearrangements Testing [J]. J Mol Diagn, 2017,19(5): 766-775.
19
Zook JM, Catoe D, McDaniel J, et al. Extensive sequencing of seven human genomes to characterize benchmark reference materials [J]. Sci Data, 2016,3:160025.
20
Cornish A, Guda C. A Comparison of Variant Calling Pipelines Using Genome in a Bottle as a Reference [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 2015:456479.
[1] 曾晓琴, 何少霞, 肖青, 明珉, 龚桂芳, 何全文, 刘洪恩. 广州市免费孕前优生健康检查服务满意度的快速评价研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(06): 748-752.
[2] 潘金成, 蒋双键, 莫承强, 陈羽. 成人原发性前列腺肉瘤的临床病理特点及预后[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 456-459.
[3] 张娣, 袁杭, 曹鹏, 夏玲芝, 黎雪梅, 王翠华, 毛源. 自身抗体免疫荧光项目混合质控品的制备及稳定性研究[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2018, 06(04): 226-228.
[4] 李欣, 李建盈, 邢萌, 张丽冉, 谢风祥, 王新国, 毕春蕊, 彭德志, 祁德波. 蛋清细胞块制作方法的改良[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2017, 05(04): 221-225.
[5] 葛燕梅, 樊苏逸, 王瑶瑶, 毛源, 曹鹏. HCV RNA商用质控品稳定性观察[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2017, 05(02): 103-106.
[6] 陆金春. 我国男科实验室精液分析现状与应对策略[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2017, 05(02): 65-70.
[7] 郭丹, 王安琪, 孙健, 徐英春. 浅谈生物样本的质量保证与质量控制[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2017, 05(01): 36-45.
阅读次数
全文


摘要